Thread regarding Citigroup Inc. / Citibank / Citi layoffs

Don't bother with Ethics

They're just as useless as HR. Give them valuable documentation, solid, credible witnesses that you know will back you up and after taking weeks and months they will come back with a weak 'we didn't find evidence ....'. Total sh1tshow. Won't even look you in the eye while vomitting the block of tu-d out because they know exactly what they saw as evidence. Granted that they too have a job to do and mouths to feed at home and that Legal will never allow admitting to wrongdoing because what's to stop someone from taking that admittance to court to sue?
Still....why have it in the first place? Regulatory purposes? Does no regulator go through a sample of ethics cases logged and the response/action taken to at least take a customary glance through whether the ethics department is just for show?

Rats...the lot of them. Suddenly, I am beginning to believe some of those things against Andy Sieg...the bank will do anything to protect MD's. Not that Citi is the only one doing this but Citi has to be amongst the worst offenders


#HR
by
| 1143 views | | 7 replies (last February 14) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kgk1nmvb

7 replies (most recent on top)

Speaking from experience I agree that filing anything with Ethics is a waste of time and only places a target on yourself. I filed a compliant with Ethics after a series of comments, multiplelle times over months, made by managing director (MD) were extremely unprofessional and degrading. HR only opened that case months later when I asked for an update, leading me to believe they were never going to investigate the matter. A week later my case was closed without any action taken against that MD. That none of the witnesses I cited as being present in those instances ever were contacted by HR highlights what a sham such investigations are. Months of no action, followed by a quick "investigation" that made zero inquiries. HR at Citigroup simply exists to protect senoir management. Citigroup losts my respect as result, along with my outperformance ( consectitive 2-2-2 year end rating) as I softly quit while interviewing externally.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ss+1kgk1nmvb

@ey It's beyond repair. They also know that they exist solely as an on-paper entity because of regulatory/some other legal need. Their primary objective is to sweep under the carpet any kind of wrongdoing and to protect Citi at all costs till their last breath. They have 0 interest in objectively and fairly investigating anything. Brent M is the loser head of this org and he probably licks clean Jane's boots every morning to keep his salary incoming. Citi is the Epstein of Corporate America - criminally rotten to the core with a demonic mindset, but by no means the only demonic entity

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fe+1kgk1nmvb

It’s time for new leadership in ethics … nobody trusts them or HR

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ey+1kgk1nmvb

@a8 No...I have a good 20-25 years left to work (AI threat aside) and I don't want a Google search showing my name alongside public/court/efinancialcareers etc. reports when the next employer is doing their due diligence on me. Google has a bad habit of never forgetting. Hunting hard for the next one and this time I will stick to smaller financial firms or something non-financial...not going to Citi or its clones anymore.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1kgk1nmvb

Go public with it

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1kgk1nmvb

Citi is a pi-p. They don’t give a sh-t about ethics’, morale, empathy, compassion…only $$$$. That is all that matters.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1kgk1nmvb

I'm sorry you had to go through that. If its any consolation, even when "actions were taken," nothing happens or changes. I think they just use those to dock the offenders bonus using the accountability matrix since it all comes down to money at the end.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1kgk1nmvb

Post a reply

: