Thread regarding BP PLC layoffs

Activist wants BP divisions to shut and hundreds of jobs to go

From today's Times (UK)

Elliott, the US investor with a stake of over 5 per cent, is agitating for a cull at the oil giant’s head office and the closure of BP Ventures.

Search authors, topics, headlines
Search

Sections

My account

UK

World

Comment

Business & Money

Sport

Life & Style

Culture

Puzzles

Magazines
More

Activist wants BP divisions to shut and hundreds of jobs to go
Elliott, the US investor with a stake of over 5 per cent, is agitating for a cull at the oil giant’s head office and the closure of BP Ventures
BP oil platform in the North Sea.
A BP oil rig in the North Sea. The activist Elliott is kicking up a storm at the company
ANDY BUCHANAN/AFP
Laith Al-Khalaf, Business Reporter
Saturday April 26 2025, 12.01am, The Sunday Times
The activist investor Elliott is lobbying for BP to axe hundreds of jobs from its head office in an attempt to cut costs and simplify the oil giant’s sprawling structure.

The American hedge fund wants BP to shut down several divisions and trim its administrative functions, according to people familiar with Elliott’s thinking.

It is understood that it is pressing the £58 billion company to close BP Ventures, its £1.2 billion venture capital arm, which has backed 75 energy start-ups that the company believes have the promise to become profitable. Over the course of its 18-year lifespan, it has deployed £900 million worth of capital to different ventures.

Elliott is also understood to want BP to axe its forecasting arm, which predicts macroeconomic conditions such as the oil price, and make cuts to its strategy team, which was responsible for plotting out the oil giant’s transition away from fossil fuels — a plan that the company is now reversing.

Last week, it emerged that Elliott has become BP’s second-largest shareholder, with a stake of more than 5 per cent in the company, equating to £2.9 billion. The hedge fund holds its position through derivatives called equity swaps.

Search authors, topics, headlines
Search

Sections

My account

UK

World

Comment

Business & Money

Sport

Life & Style

Culture

Puzzles

Magazines
More

Activist wants BP divisions to shut and hundreds of jobs to go
Elliott, the US investor with a stake of over 5 per cent, is agitating for a cull at the oil giant’s head office and the closure of BP Ventures
BP oil platform in the North Sea.
A BP oil rig in the North Sea. The activist Elliott is kicking up a storm at the company
ANDY BUCHANAN/AFP
Laith Al-Khalaf, Business Reporter
Saturday April 26 2025, 12.01am, The Sunday Times
The activist investor Elliott is lobbying for BP to axe hundreds of jobs from its head office in an attempt to cut costs and simplify the oil giant’s sprawling structure.

The American hedge fund wants BP to shut down several divisions and trim its administrative functions, according to people familiar with Elliott’s thinking.

It is understood that it is pressing the £58 billion company to close BP Ventures, its £1.2 billion venture capital arm, which has backed 75 energy start-ups that the company believes have the promise to become profitable. Over the course of its 18-year lifespan, it has deployed £900 million worth of capital to different ventures.

Business briefing Morning and midday updates on financial and economic news from our award-winning business team.
Sign up with one click
Elliott is also understood to want BP to axe its forecasting arm, which predicts macroeconomic conditions such as the oil price, and make cuts to its strategy team, which was responsible for plotting out the oil giant’s transition away from fossil fuels — a plan that the company is now reversing.

Last week, it emerged that Elliott has become BP’s second-largest shareholder, with a stake of more than 5 per cent in the company, equating to £2.9 billion. The hedge fund holds its position through derivatives called equity swaps.

Advertisement

• Elliott ups stake in BP as it pivots away from renewable energy

Its stake was first unveiled in February, leading BP to announce a raft of changes to reverse years of underperformance. The company announced that it would be rowing back on its pivot towards green energy, and that it would cut between $4 billion (£3 billion) and $5 billion of costs. It has also announced that the company’s chair, Helge Lund — who helped to spearhead the green push alongside former chief executive Bernard Looney — will be departing in 2026. At BP’s annual general meeting this month, a quarter of shareholders voted against Lund’s re-election as chair.

People familiar with Elliott’s thinking said the hedge fund believes there is still a lot more fat to cut, and that it wants BP to target $20 billion worth of free cashflow, compared to its $14 billion target. Free cashflow represents the money left over after a company has covered its working costs.

They pointed out that BP’s general and administrative expenses are about a third higher than its better-performing rival Shell.
BP’s use of management consultants has also drawn criticism. McKinsey helped with advice on BP’s green push, and is a former employer of both Lund and Giulia Chierchia, the company’s head of sustainability.

Elliott’s quest for personnel changes is not finished; those familiar with its thinking also said that the BP board had not been held accountable for underperformance, and required a further shake-up.

BP and Elliott declined to comment.

by
| 2052 views | | 6 replies (last April 28, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jss9egm1

6 replies (most recent on top)

I would buy this book if it ever gets written: “How BP was lost: A tale of greed and lust”. I have a small collection of books about BP's greed and consequences. I'm always looking for a new read in my retirement.

As for wanting to know how much BP money went to pay for friends and the pricey consultants, I know if I found out it would really pi-s me off. It's one of those things that one should not know in order to be spared the ensuing rise in blood pressure.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kx+1jss9egm1

“How BP was lost: A tale of greed and lust”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gy+1jss9egm1

@es+1jss9egm1 I would like to know whether McK were given a payment for GC leaving them, because she was a partner there. Also, would GC have been given a joining on fee?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fc+1jss9egm1

@es+1jss9egm1 big difference in hiring friends of friends to take salary from the company instead of people who actually deserve it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ex+1jss9egm1

I would love to know the sum total of what was paid to HL, GC and BL since 2020 and what was paid to McK.

All of that should be eligible for clawback based on sheer stupidity. A couple of A&M grads with 1” years in US oil companies would have done a better job.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @es+1jss9egm1

To be fair they have a proper plan which seems pretty reasonable. Cut the expensive strategy consultants who led us into failure, underperforming ventures team and go back to O&G.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eg+1jss9egm1

Post a reply

: