Thread regarding CVS layoffs

CVS Health: which team is developing Health100 App?

and what is 100 in the app name? like 100th redesigned app?


by
| 2 views | | 18 replies (last 14 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kqz1prm2

18 replies (most recent on top)

And no health 100 isn’t an ai insights engine. Health100 is a standalone business entity. There is an app by that business, there’s an ai insights engine, and there’s also many other different applications. That business will need to bring in revenues and will have very real expenses… and what’s unavoidable is in the larger picture to the public these will all roll up into healthcare expenses regardless if it’s “technology” and everyone wants less spent on healthcare not more… unsure if TM doesn’t get that there’s no runway here to create some nvda type entity with uncapped upside… adding billions in margin because of health100 means it’s at the expense of other customers (which would be reason why they won’t buy in) or a step up in overall healthcare costs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3jh+1kqz1prm2

You realize this is like saying UnitedHealth is just going to voluntarily use Caremark instead of their own Optum lol… they have their own data insights and AI capabilities. They ain’t giving over data to a competitor lol and moreso and paying the competitor while doing it

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3jg+1kqz1prm2

@3f4 health 100 is envisioned to be the platform that all other insurers will sign up to use. It’s not the app. It’s the AI analytics engine consuming the data behind that providing not just a platform for members, but the analytics for those carriers, networks, and providers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3gx+1kqz1prm2

Excuse me what specifically are you saying is getting “sold off”

Health 100’s data is as only as good as the real operating businesses get and provide it.

No one is going to a generic health 100 app that has no utility for them. Health 100 provides a consumer very little natural incentive to use on its own. Without having connection to the pharmacy, to the health plan, to the benefits to the provider… health 100 is nothing and gets no data.

The data ddat has currently is all a result of other businesses articulating and defining the business requirements to get and capture said data.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3f4+1kqz1prm2

@bz

1

Have you tried any of the legacy apps lately? Aetna Dental or Supplimental for example.

2014 era apps

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3f2+1kqz1prm2

@ee it’s gotten a lot slower and less intuitive. And I still haven’t found a store where I can open locked shelves with the app. I still have to hunt down the lone FS colleague to unlock the case

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3f1+1kqz1prm2

@3ey oh and don’t forget to think about who is being positioned to enable the coming breakup as the leader of non-DDAT businesses…..

My guess is LS. The recent ongoing leadership changes are just confirming that I can apparently see the future….

The writing is on the wall people

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3f0+1kqz1prm2

@3ey
Yep.

People forget, companies that are bought are owned by the buyer, therefore anyone from legacy companies are to be consumed by the new people in charge and then sp-t out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ez+1kqz1prm2

@kd

That’s getting sold off bud

DDAT and h100 own all of the valuable data now.

Which DDAT leader is in the spotlight for being a health innovator? That’s your answer.

Tilak will get DDAT ready for the big shakeup, but the future leader after that should be in plain sight .

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ey+1kqz1prm2

Five words...

Disney was never the same.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ke+1kqz1prm2

This ain’t about what our future is or isn’t.

If tilak (could def be)… gonna have to find a new home for all those currently under tilak that won’t be part of the H100 biz unit. Or layer tilak with some group/enterprise tech leader. There’s internal tech just needed to run the business that’s def not part of H100…

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kd+1kqz1prm2

It’s Tilak- our future is digital health services.
Named by an outside agency.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jw+1kqz1prm2

Will def have to be “owned” by a seperate new business unit if they plan to monetize and engage all the different “customers” they aspire to… that’s likely gonna have to be the case to TRY to avoid FTC scrutiny.

I can only imagine the internal political game of thrones happening to try and figure out what that “working model” looks like… who “owns” prioritization/investment/roadmapping … who owns the accountability of delivering the ROI. Who’s the internal voice for the other customers that they don’t have… who is “the business”

The longer it lingers the longer they give time for people to be consumed by talking about the unknowns.

They need to just appoint a formal president of health100 and announce it broadly that lucky exec is responsible for figuring it out and accountable for delivering results. Right now there seems to be a few different execs responsible for parts of it but no singular owner.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @f8+1kqz1prm2

@a9 that pi---s me off….h1b bs. Waste of money. Hire FTEs and keep them around. Forget the app.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @f2+1kqz1prm2

What ever happened to the Super App? Or was that Super BS?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ee+1kqz1prm2

The same teams as developing the old cvs app. Health 100 is just the old app with new colors & font & some new capabilities

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d4+1kqz1prm2

how many fcking apps does this company need to create?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bz+1kqz1prm2

100 H1B Hire to complete the project

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1kqz1prm2

Post a reply

: