Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Stop the madness - sell the Ohio site to a Datacenter Company or Micron.

This a joke. Stop all construction ASAP.

by
| 2054 views | | 17 replies (last June 28) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jymrzzf0

17 replies (most recent on top)

No different than F42, which was also started based on expected growth, then delayed for some years.

The Ohio site will be a fab long after the former employees of the Intel corp will remember it exists.

It will be a fab when many other, old Intel fabs have been sold.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @p3+1jymrzzf0

But but... what about the carbon footprint? Will intel be liable? Cow farts have less impact. Turn it into a parlor

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @p2+1jymrzzf0

@e8 ... this article has an aerial view photos from February. Not completed building yet but a lot of work and materials have gone into the effort.

https://newsroom.intel.com/corporate/ohio-one-construction-timeline-update

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ep+1jymrzzf0

It's a field at this point

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e8+1jymrzzf0

I see Pat's still living rent-free in a lot of heads these days. Brilliant.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ce+1jymrzzf0

@an these are empty buildings at this point.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @as+1jymrzzf0

When I said the Intel board was crazy for hiring a guy they fired for corruption, people on this site gave me grief.
That was pretty much the end of Intel and when Flo said it was time to go.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ar+1jymrzzf0

The truth is only Intel can buy its own fabs. Nobody else is interesting to buy or has expertises to operate them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @an+1jymrzzf0

Fort Worth’s loss was Chandlers gain. There were a few reasons for Intel pulling out of Texas but I think the main one was the tax dollars the School District was going to lose. Even though Ohio su-ks I don’t think Intel pulling out of there is a good idea, now California is a different story.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1jymrzzf0

Ohio will be a fab a lot longer than any troll replying to this post will be working for Intel (if they ever did work for Intel).

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1jymrzzf0

Can we all just all admit now that Pat talks a lot of sh-t and accomplishes Nothing. He thinks people are with him and his ideas when they are not. Yep, same Pat from Intel in the 90s. He is and has always been a whiny yuppy fu-k.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1jymrzzf0

I told you before you hired him as CEO. Pat was part of the problem not the solution. I know because I was there.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1jymrzzf0

The Ohio site will be harder to sell than the Folsom site. Nobody wants it!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1jymrzzf0

Maybe Intel can sell the Ohio site to Temu.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1jymrzzf0

Intel can't even sell Xeons.

What makes you think we can sell a fab?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1jymrzzf0

Pat’s legacy.
A bridge to nowhere.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1jymrzzf0

The Fort Worth Texas plans for an Intel fab were scrapped in the early 2000's. Anything is possible.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1jymrzzf0

Post a reply

: