Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

ohio plant delayed

ohio chip plant delayed to 2030 or 2031 https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/2025/02/28/intel-ohio-chip-factory-delayed-new-albany/80732342007/#:~:text=Intel%20delays%20%2428%20billion%20Ohio,again%2C%20to%202030%20or%202031&text=Intel%20has%20delayed%20the%20opening,chip%20production%20with%20market%20demand.

by
| 2102 views | | 16 replies (last March 4, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jn7awavw

16 replies (most recent on top)

@qr is a mouthbreather who hasn’t seen his wiener without a mirror since 1997.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @re+1jn7awavw

Dear grammar police. Free exchange of ideas comes from passion. Ain't nobody got time for you. Go Fu-k Yourself!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qr+1jn7awavw

your you’re their there they’re to two too then than it’s its

Several Intel employees’ minds just exploded.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pv+1jn7awavw

Slow Down, Ohio was divested from as an experimental artist community like four decades ago.

No one is looking to build Indian restaurants there. What an uninformed, raycist comment.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pt+1jn7awavw

So if your building Indian food restaurants in Ohio, Slow Down.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ph+1jn7awavw

Fudzilla says it best: Originally slated to dazzle the world+dog in 2025, the debut has now been fashionably delayed to 2030, with operations possibly commencing in 2031. This marks a mere five- to six-year delay which is just a blink of an eye in geological terms.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @p7+1jn7awavw

What about IRS Statute 156A.2i, clause 6 which specifies Intel is allowed a full refund for being too big to fail? BOO-YAH!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @p6+1jn7awavw

@dc+1jn7awavw

You sück di-k because you enjoy it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eh+1jn7awavw

@dc I’ll be a customer. Can I pay you in Raptor Lake chips and guacamole?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dm+1jn7awavw

Can't build a fab without government handouts but expect to compete with TSMC ahahaha

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dk+1jn7awavw

Good! The cows can graze in the open fields a lot longer. Better than a fab producing useless chips

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c7+1jn7awavw

It never made any sense and always smelled like a con, as per all of PG's "plans". I used to be as proud of an Intel employee as you could find, but that was long ago and we live in a different world now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ap+1jn7awavw

No customer demand equals no fab required. This is not the Field of Dreams - build a fab and customers will purchase non competitive products.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ak+1jn7awavw

PG did not plan this to benefit the INTC. Intention may be something else.
Where was the fund or planned fund for all the factory build outs? Just some kind of snake oil selling :)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1jn7awavw

Nice find. Look, the plan always needed a wide 18A fab network to amortize the costs of 5N4Y. So canning the Ohio fab (2030 is going on never, basically) means investors won’t ever get their money back. Expect 14A cancellation soon

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1jn7awavw

Pat GELSINGER's plan failed miserably on 18A!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1jn7awavw

Post a reply

: