Thread regarding Verizon Communications Inc. layoffs

Dan Schulman

Dear Dan Schulman,
I am writing to respectfully urge decisive leadership in reaching a timely and forward-looking agreement with the union representing Verizon’s workforce. A prolonged contract dispute is more than a labor issue — it is a strategic business risk that affects competitiveness, brand trust, operational stability, and long-term shareholder value.
In today’s telecommunications environment, reliability and service quality are inseparable from workforce stability. Highly skilled technicians, customer service professionals, and infrastructure specialists form the backbone of network performance and customer satisfaction. When negotiations extend unnecessarily, uncertainty erodes morale, productivity declines, and institutional knowledge becomes vulnerable to attrition. The financial impact of workforce disruption — even without a strike — often exceeds the cost of reaching a fair agreement earlier.
More importantly, resolving an extended contract now positions Verizon Communications for strategic advantage in several measurable ways:

  1. Operational Continuity and Service Excellence
    A secure and engaged workforce delivers more consistent network performance, faster deployment of infrastructure upgrades, and stronger customer experience metrics — all critical differentiators in a highly competitive market.
  2. Cost Predictability and Risk Reduction
    Prolonged labor uncertainty introduces hidden costs: contingency planning, delayed projects, reputational exposure, and potential customer churn. A stable contract converts uncertainty into predictable budgeting and planning horizons.
  3. Competitive Positioning in 5G and Next-Generation Infrastructure
    Network expansion and technological innovation require cooperation and trust between leadership and labor. Alignment accelerates deployment timelines, improves implementation quality, and strengthens execution discipline — all essential in maintaining industry leadership.
  4. Talent Retention and Recruitment
    The telecommunications sector competes aggressively for technical expertise. A demonstrated commitment to fair, timely agreements signals stability and respect, strengthening recruitment and reducing costly turnover.
  5. Brand Reputation and Investor Confidence
    Markets reward stability. Customers and investors view constructive labor relations as a sign of strong governance and long-term strategic clarity. Early resolution communicates disciplined leadership and operational foresight.
  6. Long-Term Financial Performance
    Sustained productivity, reduced disruption risk, and improved execution capability directly support revenue growth, margin stability, and capital efficiency. In practical terms, a timely agreement is not simply a labor expense — it is an investment in operational resilience.
    History across multiple industries shows that companies that treat labor negotiations as strategic partnerships — rather than prolonged contests — consistently outperform peers in reliability, innovation adoption, and customer loyalty. The telecommunications sector, where infrastructure and human expertise are deeply intertwined, magnifies this effect.
    Resolving the contract sooner rather than later is not a concession. It is a leadership decision that aligns economic prudence with strategic vision. Stability now enables focus on growth, innovation, and market leadership rather than internal uncertainty.
    Strong companies build durable advantages not only through technology and capital, but through trust, alignment, and shared purpose. A timely agreement reinforces all three.
    Thank you for your leadership and consideration of the long-term interests of the company, its workforce, and the customers who depend on both.
    Respectfully,

by
| 4932 views | | 17 replies (last February 21) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1khf30t9v

17 replies (most recent on top)

@15b im sorry Verizon realized you were dead weight, and if they haven't they will soon 😉! But the union is here to stay. Like it or not. I would suggest moving on,all this negativity is not becoming of you. I hope you have the day you deserve.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @15f+1khf30t9v

I hope they lay off the entire union. every single employee. Go ahead and walk union it’s not like they don’t have outsource to replace you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @15b+1khf30t9v

@w2 you have great insight on what type of extension is coming

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @x3+1khf30t9v

Don't worry about Dan. He knows what he is doing. A tiger is very selective in its hunt for prey. They don't go after large groups. That is foolish and results in uneeded risk to injury. They pick off the solitary and the weak. A wise predator lives long and well exercising this technique.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wc+1khf30t9v

You're dreaming. This company is now over 80% non-union. Headed just in the right direction the hatchet man wants. You're either going to be forced into a cr-ppy extension or put on the street and declared a financial burden then replaced. The rifs just displaced the incoming and soon to be new rounds of lay-offs to keep the money number looking good. Wait till next qtr when all the churn shows up from the employees who canned their 2nd tire wireless service.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @w2+1khf30t9v

@pf Dear Dan —
Thank you for your thoughtful note. It’s always refreshing to see such confidence paired so courageously with such a selective understanding of history, labor economics, and basic negotiating dynamics.
You seem quite certain that union influence “ended” in 2012 — a fascinating claim, considering collective bargaining agreements, wage floors, safety standards, and benefit structures don’t typically persist by spontaneous corporate generosity. Institutions rarely maintain costly worker protections out of nostalgia. They do so because leverage — past and present — makes ignoring them expensive.
Your advice to accept a buyout “long before the strike” is particularly insightful. It suggests you recognize the very pressure mechanism you also claim doesn’t exist. After all, companies don’t accelerate buyouts out of sentimentality — they do so to reduce exposure before a credible disruption. One might almost conclude that the possibility of collective action still carries weight.
Equally impressive is your framing of reduced healthcare coverage and minimal wage growth as something workers should simply absorb with quiet gratitude. That perspective assumes the purpose of negotiation is compliance rather than equilibrium — an understandable confusion if one has only ever observed labor relations from the comfort of spreadsheets rather than the reality of risk, skill, and infrastructure dependency.
As for the suggestion that experience and institutional memory make someone a “relic,” history tends to show the opposite. Systems function best when the people who understand how they actually work — physically, operationally, and contractually — remain involved. Removing them is less modernization and more amnesia with quarterly reporting.
Still, I appreciate your concern. It takes conviction to offer strategic advice while simultaneously dismissing the very forces that make that strategy rational.
Warm regards,
Someone who prefers evidence to slogans

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pj+1khf30t9v

Regardless of who or how this post was written, there is a lot of truth in it. With that said, as one of the 13,000 employees that was laid off, (after almost 26 years of service), I can say that they will not let Union negotiations fail leading to a strike, as there are not enough management employees left to go cover the union jobs as has been done in the past, it simply cannot be done and have the business continuity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ef+1khf30t9v

@dx just mabe they should have unionized. The ones that are left still can!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e0+1khf30t9v

Easy to say but realizing that he laid off two entire states of employees who have families etc.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dx+1khf30t9v

Expect a ratification vote before end of March. For those who wish to call this false. Remember seeing this later

90-95. % will vote yes
80-85 % will claim National did nothing but voted yes and will complain as usual after the fact

No strife. No fight. Riding the downward slope.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dr+1khf30t9v

@dn sorry if the truth hurts! But it is what it is! Enjoy your Sunday!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dq+1khf30t9v

@d9 foff

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dn+1khf30t9v

Dan has a portal for messages to him, send it there.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cy+1khf30t9v

I find it very telling that one assums, because something is written with full and grammatically correct sentences that a bot wrote it. Tells me a lot about the individuals commenting 🙄.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cq+1khf30t9v

Laying off 13000 employees strengthened the union’s hand

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c8+1khf30t9v

Nice chatgpt response

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b6+1khf30t9v

The future will be brought to you by union dial tone.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b3+1khf30t9v

Post a reply

: