Thread regarding Shell Oil layoffs

Here we go again... Shell is studying merits of buying BP, Bloomberg News reports

Wael will likely need to pursue further divestments or accelerate those already in motion to help fund the takeover, should it move forward. Alternatively, Shell could issue more shares as part of the deal, similar to the BG Group acquisition, where Shell used a mix of cash and stock, though that would dilute existing shareholders AGAIN.

https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/shell-studying-merits-bp-deal-193813757.html

(Reuters) -Shell Plc is working with advisers to evaluate a potential acquisition of BP Plc, though it is waiting for further stock and oil price declines before deciding whether to pursue a bid, Bloomberg News reported on Saturday citing people familiar with the matter.

The oil major has been more seriously discussing the feasibility and merits of a takeover with its advisers in recent weeks, the report said, adding that any final decision will likely depend on whether the rival's stock continues to slide.

It may also wait for BP to reach out or for another suitor to make a first move, and its current work could help it get prepared for such a scenario, some of the people told Bloomberg News.

Deliberations are in the early stages and Shell may opt to focus on share buybacks and bolt-on acquisitions rather than a megamerger, the report added.

"As we have said many times before we are sharply focused on capturing the value in Shell through continuing to focus on performance, discipline and simplification,” a Shell spokesperson said when asked about the report.

BP did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.

by
| 3442 views | | 18 replies (last June 15, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jtbyrte5

18 replies (most recent on top)

All the wrong decisions on what to buy and what to sell! If Shell were really considering buying BP, the deal would be closed a long time ago.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @687+1jtbyrte5

I guarantee you Murray is chasing YL. Murray is a Canadian wh--e who just wants his big payday.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wh+1jtbyrte5

Current bpX employee here. Buy the assets but the not the people. bpX culture is toxic and will infect the rest of any company it joins.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ps+1jtbyrte5

Former Shell upstream employee, current BPX upstream employee.

The only thing worth buying from BP is BPX; BPX is generating phenomenal results.

Knowing how Shell operates, I pray Shell doesn't buy us...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pn+1jtbyrte5

What if they bought a good and profitable asset instead?

What if they bought a more profitable company instead?

Why chase trouble when you could chase quality and profit?

I mean for partnering/marriage do you find the ugliest person with crippling debt and behavioral problems hoping to compel them to have plastic surgery, go to therapy, and make them work a second job, and put them on a workout routine? It is the same thing but played out on the stock market.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @p8+1jtbyrte5

It is really hard to interpret " I'd rather buy more Shell shares"

  1. Oh, they're forcing me to do this.

or

  1. It isn't going to happen, I am content just evaporating 20 % of the profit on buy backs

or

  1. I'm not supposed to say anything yet, that's insider trading

or

  1. Mess + Worse mess = Mess that is worse than either; but, it plays to my strengths all I have to do is keep firing people
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kw+1jtbyrte5

This time it is different because bp's value has deteriorated so much compared to Shell. This is a great opportunity for a company to purchase some great Assets. Shell has the best chance to get UK government approval than any other foreign company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ks+1jtbyrte5

@hx+1jtbyrte5

My assumption would be if Shell did buy BP, Shell would keep the upstream assets and BP would be a spinoff of the downstream business. So BP would be over chemicals and refining, which is funny since they sold ALL of their chemicals to INEOS a few years ago.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @k1+1jtbyrte5

This has been discussed for the last 17-18 years I have been at Shell. I really dont see it happening.

  • One, it would probably not be approved by UK government.
  • Two, Shell can let BP lose even further value over the next 5-6 years, pay off more of its debt from the BG buyout, buy back more of its own shares, buy Shell in 2030 when BP is probably worth half the value it is now.

We will see.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jn+1jtbyrte5

YL will desperate to do this so he can say that he achieved something.

Would be a great distraction away from his lack of vision. Plus he could use it a reason to cut really deep.

Only issue is they’ve wasted the money they could have used to buy bp on share buy backs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jg+1jtbyrte5

With Shell having only Norco would you see them contemplating continuing to operate the two remaining bp US refineries?

Cherry Point - WA 250K BPD / Whiting - Indiana 440K BPD

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hx+1jtbyrte5

Synergies = 10% workforce reduction
Good luck...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @h8+1jtbyrte5

@d4+1jtbyrte5

it’s by far most common to have the majority of the losses on the side of the company that is bought

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e3+1jtbyrte5

BP is the underperforming company here. Shell better prioritize reduction in staff on the incoming BP staff over the incumbent Shell staff. Shell needs to show care to it's people. Something they haven't been doing lately!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d4+1jtbyrte5

Yep….Based on typical redundancies after a merger…the figures are pretty significant
Combined global workforce (2023–24): ~145,000 (Shell: ~93,000 | BP: ~52,000)
• Typical post-merger cuts: 5–15% of combined staff

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d3+1jtbyrte5

If the merger takes place mega job cuts would be inevitable…looking at past mergers:

  1. Exxon–Mobil (1999)

• Merger value: ~$80 billion
• Job cuts: ~9,000 (approx. 7–10% of combined workforce)

  1. Chevron–Texaco (2001)

• Merger value: ~$45 billion
• Job cuts: ~4,000 (approx. 7% of workforce)

  1. BP–Amoco (1998)

• Merger value: ~$48 billion
• Job cuts: ~6,000 (over 10% of combined headcount)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d2+1jtbyrte5

When you’re incapable of finding, developing and growing reserves the “old fashioned” way, you’re left with bottom feeding for acquisition scraps.
Shell would be way late to the mega-acquisition party. The tables have been cleared and last call was cut off long ago.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b9+1jtbyrte5

wow, seems like it would be a good time to not have spent 46 billion on stock buybacks in the last 3 years

now that we’re here, expect nothing to change. why get assets when you can buy back stock

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aj+1jtbyrte5

Post a reply

: