Will Kaskida field development be a technical and commercial success?
Why does Kaskida not have other co-owners to differ cost and risk…
6 replies (most recent on top)
Through mostly Enbridge. Shell is a small piece of that pipeline route.
@c4 BP's Kaskida project in the Gulf of Mexico, oil production will be routed to Shell's Green Canyon Block 19…
…. What Shell infrastructure? The pipeline isn’t Shell…. If anything, the GC corridor is….
Kaskida is the slippery slope to Shell takeover…and BP will be over the barrel…
Tied to Shell infrastructure. and, BP ups its participation in Shell Mars/Ursa
bp had a partner lined up but chose to go 100% initially after they did initial appraisal work. My understanding is bp wanted to see the potential value before farming out
You can ask in a town hall, but I doubt you'll get a straight answer, but you might get a decent one from the project manager or the people on the project. Overall the answer about being a success is maybe. BP has been sitting on it for almost 2 decades because there are a number of challenges. In that time other companies have brought on other fields in the paleogene/Wilcox. Companies BP would normally partner with already have a lot of exposure to this play. There are other fields that they could buy into with proven production. There are companies that do not like being non op to BP due to costs or history.