Thread regarding Verizon Communications Inc. layoffs

RIF CA remote workers

If you only received a 30 daybWARN notice, CHALLENGE IT. They are trying to sc--w those of us that work remote. Your job profile probably says walnut or Irvine. Contact the Ask HR and be sure to challenge their policy (which is not the law). Here is what I sent... (the more of us that challenge their bad business practice the better for all of us)

Dear HR Department / [Specific HR Contact Name if known],
I am writing to formally acknowledge receipt of the layoff notification dated November 20, 2025, with an effective date of December 20, 2025.
Given the significant number of employees affected by the recent workforce reduction, both within California and company-wide, I have questions regarding the notice period provided under applicable state and federal laws, specifically the California WARN Act and the federal WARN Act.
The notice I received provides 30 days' advance notice. However, both the federal WARN Act and the California WARN Act generally require employers to provide at least 60 days' advance written notice for mass layoffs.
I kindly request the following information:
Clarification of the Notice Period: Please confirm if the 30-day notice period is being provided in accordance with a specific exception to the 60-day notice requirement (such as the "unforeseeable business circumstances" or "faltering company" exceptions), and if so, provide documentation supporting the applicability of that exception.
Documentation of Compliance: Please provide documentation verifying that notice has been given to the appropriate state agency (California Employment Development Department (EDD)) and local government officials as required by the WARN Act regulations. Employers can email their notices to the EDD at eddwarnnotice@edd.ca.gov.
I appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and look forward to receiving the requested information.
Sincerely,
[Your Full Name]
[Your Phone Number]
[Your Employee ID Number]


by
| 1304 views | | 14 replies (last November 26) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kay27vaz

14 replies (most recent on top)

@ea Everyone need to send the drafted letter to HR at the email below.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @em+1kay27vaz

I am a work at home verizon employee based in California. Was only given 30 day notice. They claim it's because WAH is not covered by the WARN ACT. My work profile shows Irvine as my Primary Location. I think verizon is being shady and have opened themselves up to a potential lawsuit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ea+1kay27vaz

@ce ask hr

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dy+1kay27vaz

This is the email to send the inquiry to.

hranswers.us@verizon.com

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ds+1kay27vaz

@b5 Knowing Verizon it's purposely skirting the rules/law because it knows it will save more money by giving less pay/severance than a settled lawsuit. THAT'S THE REAL VERIZON!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d7+1kay27vaz

@c4 I got the same reply from HR. Pretty stupid that since I’m a mobile worker I don’t get WARN notice because I’m not on-site but part of a massive layoff. Hilarious

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cr+1kay27vaz

I’m also in New York City. I don’t believe they fired less than 50 employees here

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cq+1kay27vaz

I was home based in NYC, and i received a December 19 (payroll date). Checking online the law and it states that it should have been 90 days notice!!!
Anyone from New York who was let go here?
Thanks

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ce+1kay27vaz

Walnut Creek and Irvine were the only locations in CA where 60 day notice was given — per HR training

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c4+1kay27vaz

I already sent my email and know people in my group RIFd got the 60 days and a few of us remotes got 30 days, but have managers in the 60 day location. Knowing VZ they probably found a loophole, but doesn't hurt to try.

California WARN: How It Applies to a Hybrid Employee

Under California WARN, your “site of employment” is not just where you physically sit. Instead, it is defined by the location to which you are assigned or from which you receive your direction and supervision.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b5+1kay27vaz

I believe the Federal WARN Act applies to private and nonprofit employers. Sorry.
Also, exceptions would be for a faltering company. I guess you could consider Vz as a faltering company, defined as a company that is in financial distress but is actively seeking capital or new business in a last ditch effort to avoid closing down.

I'm getting out while the getting is still good!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @am+1kay27vaz

NJ folks had an off payroll date of Feb 20 but CA was 12/20. I was told that only certain locations in CA have 60/90 day requirement. Chatgpt gives different answer, so not sure.
What abt NY, VA and TX?
Unless it is categorized under unforeseeable conditions …….

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ab+1kay27vaz

OP, there are more that 50 affected per site?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1kay27vaz

Great information and thanks for the example!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1kay27vaz

Post a reply

: