Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

What Is LBT Supposed To Do?

Is he supposed to keep everyone that Pat kept on the payroll and try to find a way to actually turn the company around when there is absolutely no chance of it? Should he just give VSP (CPM) again like Pat did when VSP (CPM) devastated many groups/modules, leaving them with no qualified people to replace those who left? How about just keep everyone for tradition's sake, all the while the company continues to lose money? Yeah, there ya go! uggh

Come on people!

This isn't on LBT. This whole thing is on Pat Gelsinger and, most of all, Paul Otellini. Don't be blaming a new CEO for their failures!

I'm an Intel employee and I will be extremely upset if I get laid off. BUT such things have to be done if Intel is to survive. That's just all there is to it! If I get laid off, then I made the wrong choice by staying with Intel, and I'll have to deal with it.

Just be glad they are offering a good severance which is costing them billions. They don't HAVE to offer anything!!!

by
| 2785 views | | 33 replies (last July 12) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jzt7g3t7

33 replies (most recent on top)

Reduction of layers in reporting lines is what he committed to do but not evident yet.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gx+1jzt7g3t7

He's doing what he was hired to do: right-size the company to prep for sale.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bk+1jzt7g3t7

If he has any talent or skill he should have joined AMD or NVIDIA instead of stuck at this sinking ShitTel.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bg+1jzt7g3t7

If Andy were here, you would all largely be gone.

What LBT is doing is nothing compared to what Andy would have done.

He laid off a THIRD of the workers in 1970.

This is just a much needed haircut.

Fab workers are getting hysterical because they now see what everyone else was experiencing in each layoff since BK.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b2+1jzt7g3t7

@ah yes there is fat to be cut you listed the correct examples

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b0+1jzt7g3t7

@aw LOL

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @az+1jzt7g3t7

Ok, Well, I work S6 in AZ. I gotta go to bed. This was a great conversation (I am OP). I appreciate all the responses no matter how d-mb they may have been. Good luck to everyone! I truly hope things work out for all of you no matter what world view you may have.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ay+1jzt7g3t7

@ap it’s new bullsh-t lol. The layoffs are financially necessary but some of the leaders he put in charge like Lisa P are making decisions that the company will soon regret

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ax+1jzt7g3t7

@aa Intel is becoming the AZ Cardinals of companies .. go there to "retire" and make easy bucks and fail at your job!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aw+1jzt7g3t7

@at BO-M! But I hope Intel is still the name on it!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @av+1jzt7g3t7

He did what he had to do. It just su-ks because I liked the commute, the team, the office, the food in the cafeteria, the work I did and the gym at the office. Everything except the hours.

I accept it was necessary, I just hate it because I wanted to work there forever.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @as+1jzt7g3t7

@aq I can't. LBT already explained most of them are going away. That's a good thing. I think we are on the same page here.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ar+1jzt7g3t7

@an execs are by far the most replaceable positions in the company (if fact they rotate around the same jobs across companies all the time, see lbt recent hires) so you can really just pick them randomly.
How about you tell me an exec that made an outstanding contribution? One that actually came and turned things around in their org?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aq+1jzt7g3t7

@am I am not hearing the same bullsh!t. Its a new era. It isn't the same bullsh!t anymore. Look what's happening right now! It's different now!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ap+1jzt7g3t7

@ah Who are the execs would you cut? Anybody non-essential?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @an+1jzt7g3t7

This dumpster fire isn't recoverable. Everyone should be executing or at least working on an exit plan. 18A was going to be the game changer and TSMC would be in the rear view mirror. Oh wait, let's shelve 18A and start the new chant 2 more years and 14A will put TSMC in the rear view mirror... How many times do you have to hear the same bullsh!t? Look at the product side, coming up on the 20th incremental version of the core processors... nothing new or innovative. There is nothing on the roadmap that screams turnaround.

If Intel could just accept their fate and stop trying to regain industry leadership things could calm down and Intel can settle into being a third tier supplier that makes a good income and would be a good place to work. Huge sums of money are being thrown away on a pipe dream that will never come true.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @am+1jzt7g3t7

@ah also, do not hire execs from other companies. That proved over and over to be not only useless but detrimental.
Find the right people inside and promote them (not me, IDGAF about managing, I wanna code)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ak+1jzt7g3t7

@ag Ok Then... How would you handle this situation?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aj+1jzt7g3t7

@af sell real estate and boost wfh. Fire execs with high salaries and ACTUALLY make the company engineer centered and flatter. Stop acquiring failing startups. There's plenty of places where you can cut cuts. Cutting workforce is deliberate to boost the stock value momentarily and allow shareholders to make some money back

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ah+1jzt7g3t7

@ae I do not know them personally, that's the point. This will put thousands of families through financial hardship. I'm not ok with that, it bothers me a lot. There are ways to handle Intel crisis that require close to zero layoffs. If you think slashing workforce is the only way you're just being very naive

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ag+1jzt7g3t7

@ad Well, how would you handle it?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1jzt7g3t7

@ab I understand that. I'm in the same situation. But you might want to think about all the others that will retain their jobs because of what's going on right now. Or are you only worried about those whom you know personally?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1jzt7g3t7

@aa I guess we will see. I don't necessarily disagree with you, but what other choice do we have?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1jzt7g3t7

@a5 quite the opposite. I think about all the colleagues who have family and bills and mortgages, and cannot take the hit of being laid off right now. I'm fine personally. Lots of people will be not, but I guess they are the self centered ones and you are the master of compassion

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ab+1jzt7g3t7

@a8 that worked magic in the past! Execs from Qualcomm, amd, etc. lasted a year average, zero positive impact, no contributions, big bonuses.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1jzt7g3t7

@a6 what? Cutting the salary of our Lords and saviors? Are you crazy?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1jzt7g3t7

@a6 New executives coming on board. Give them a chance for god's sake!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1jzt7g3t7

@a3 He is here to save the company, not you!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1jzt7g3t7

Cut executive pay. Their horrible decision making for the past decade is what got us into this mess, yet ELT has mostly gotten off scot-free. Cut their salary, and if they don’t like it, they can quit without severance.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1jzt7g3t7

@a4 This is where you are wrong... You're only thinking about yourself, not the rest of the people who will still be employed by Intel.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1jzt7g3t7

Yeah this is where you are wrong: "BUT such things have to be done if Intel is to survive."

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1jzt7g3t7

Yeah give the poor billionaire a break!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1jzt7g3t7

Post a reply

: