Thread regarding CDK Global Inc. layoffs

HR organization - more messed up than you think

How do you judge a company’s culture is messed up?

One way to look at Glassdoor reviews to see what people say but there is another way, take a look at the HR function and evaluate what’s going to be coached.

For last few years, HR teams engagement scores are low, well they are humans but funny part is, their scores have been lowest in the organization. This team has never done any action on their survey results ever! The only reason results change is because new people do not start with same problem most often. The attrition in the HR team is worth commenting on.

Here is the state of art HR Team:
Site HR scrambles most of the time with continuous churn of team members and shifting alignment, recruiting is swamped, benefits keep going down, compensation is a joke both from bench marking to communication stand point, Systems are half baked and the great helpmehr is very leisurely. If you get an answer for your HR question without being tossed at least 5 times, then you are seriously lucky.

HR lady reflects an Avon mentality by not just wearing 90’s fashion trend of brooches in all hands meet but also at work by looking to cut costs, pushing people to be working from office and creating a not so transparent culture. She and her leaders are all seen as lacking empathy, dishonest and manipulative. Ever wonder how many HR names you had to remember in last 2 years, search them in outlook and you will find most of them gone.

I would not take advice from fake CHRO or her lieutenants on how to keep team engage, keep attrition low or how to be inspirational or transformational. She can’t seem to keep her house in order so should not preach!!

by
| 4133 views | | 11 replies (last February 26, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+17xdPnqV

11 replies (most recent on top)

and here we are at the end of February and w2 is still not available.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @24ufc+17xdPnqV

For the 3rd year in a row, W-2's are messed up. How can a company that employs as many HR-drones as CDK does mess up W-2's nearly every year.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1Jtzc+17xdPnqV

@amio+17xdPnqV This explains a lot about why no matter how much I busted my @ss I still got an average review. The same went for a lot of my coworkers. The final straw for me was when my boss was enthusiastic about my review before sending it in for "calibration" by the HR people who knocked me down to an average rating. Little did I know it was unqualified HR people who had no idea what my team or I produced who were deciding my fate. So glad I got out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @Jgsu+17xdPnqV

Incompetency is an understatement when they forget to send out payroll on time. I was wondering what was going on with the payroll - thought I was fired over the holiday.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @Extg+17xdPnqV

@Edcm+17xdPnqV : That is incorrect: R&D, Sales, Dev... everyone who qualified all got stock and bonuses back in September/October.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @Etey+17xdPnqV

HR Lady must have a golden key... how she rates stock bonuses that she gets is beyond me.. Check out Form 4 filings.. She got 30K+ shares when the rest of the company got promises.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @Edcm+17xdPnqV

Lol, what makes you think that I am looking for your support? Knew this is how you were going to react, that is why commented after I left your team. It proves the point that instead of looking into solving problem you actually look for scapegoats. Your empathy and maturity as a leader is low, not a bad idea to create a chamber to self-reflect.

I pity people working in your team! :(

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @Edsf+17xdPnqV

I for one don’t vent on a online form.
Reach out and don’t be a baby. We don’t have room for your type and I’m round not to support you. Enjoy your eco chamber

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oxyp+17xdPnqV

They waste their time on useless things like all the inclusion and diversity hiring discussions of late. For some team, 80+% are in India. There is no diversity like they preach and constantly try to shove down our throats

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cmlr+17xdPnqV

Both assessments above are certainly accurate from my experience.

HR is a support organization producing zero revenue for the company. They are overhead which by definition should be lean and highly productive. CDK HR is full of high priced 'imaginations' who commit to all types of new programs with fancy PowerPoints each year, but are never held accountable for all the delivery failures and/or wasted effort they impose on engineering.

Why are some of these HR associates promoted to VP positions or receiving high calibration ratings when they produce very limited results (taking years of effort to complete anything simple), have excess resourcing (duplication), and never tackle the big problems (which have been identified for years and have performance impacts across the company)?

Compare this HR leisurely delivery approach to our engineering teams which actually produce a set of revenue based products and with very limited resources are put under a microscope and driven (via Agile + PMO) to a completely different level of urgency, delivery effort, and measurable results, while mostly rated 'average' each year under an arcane HR imposed bell curve.

Any Engineering rating above 'average' requires a calibration review by HR (who know nothing about engineering nor high performance) to assesses if an engineering resource 'qualifies' for a higher rating.

When was the last time an HR employee, being assessed for an HR VP promotion or an HR associate high performance rating, was thoroughly evaluated via a calibration review with associated Engineering 'customers', assessing and voting on the performance merits of HR promotions or high ratings?

Never is the answer and it certainly shows!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @amio+17xdPnqV

Not to mention the fact that they turn a blind eye to obviously unethical activities by middle management that have been reported. Activities they themselves question but stay silent about. I must say that the HRBPs I worked with were either very new to HR (it is that churn ) or were smooth talkers who acted like they cared, but then do nothing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1iky+17xdPnqV

Post a reply

: