Thread regarding Dell Inc. layoffs

If you enjoy Dell, find a way to get into the Federal department and you are almost immune to layoffs.

If you enjoy/like working at Dell, my suggestion would be to find a way to move into the Federal department. Even sales people. You are safer in the fed environment 100% but, because you are in sales... your org in general is always "first up" on the chopping block... Fed sales got sla-ghtered a few years ago but only because Dell decided they wanted t6o move towards an "online" approach, in which most positions simply were not needed. This happened in corporate to a much larger scale.

For anybody NOT in sales, get into FED if you can..

EVERY SINGLE EMPLOYEE in FED is US based. Nothing can be outsourced, nobody can be replaced by someone in India or outside of the US, you literally HAVE to live in and reside IN the USA. The FED space is annoyingly strict about this and anybody in fed can't even talk to corporate employees about certain things unless they are fed vetted.

Background checks are more expensive for new hires, new hires/potentials must be in the US, have clean records, etc etc... and it's far easier to axe corporate folks because they don't need the extra BG checks and it doesn't matter where they live. They also aren't risking a bitter employee leaking government documents, purchase orders, IP address's of networking equipment or idk, whatever tf else.

Pretty sure the DoD, Army, or DoE wouldn't be OK with having their sht released by a bitter employee, versus some small business called "Flight deals" having their stuff released. They wouldn't be ok with it either but, FED sales isn't dealing with anybody but government agencies.

Again, I'm NOT in sales but I do help manage the protection of the information that the sales org obatains, has, and deals with.

Long story short, layoffs rarely touch FED because of the sensitive data EVERYBODY works with and/or knows.

Source - someone who works in security and compliance.

by
| 1332 views | | 8 replies (last August 3) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k19q8bt2

8 replies (most recent on top)

@a1 lol you are pathetic. Trump has been in office for not even a year and you want to blame him somehow? The biggest layoffs have been under BIDEN in the last 4 years. But yes, lets blame Trump for it right?

Dell does what it takes to stay out of the media and prevent negativity. MD is a registered Repub but kissed bidens a-s like no tomorrow. He did so because it kept his company out of any type of negative spotlight. He didn't "kiss" Trumps a-s but was likely relieved he could run his company normally again without fear of being cancelled by id--ts.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @14y+1k19q8bt2

@a5 Immune to layoffs? Of course not. Nobody is immune to that except maybe JC and other high up execs.

Fed is absolutely less likely to be hit with layoffs compared to corporate, though. And by a LONG shot. The entire federal department is only 1687 people compared to 107k on corporate, which is WORLD WIDE. If Dell just wants to cut numbers then who do you think they'll go for first? The most expensive employees in corporate, then overseas folk. Same with cost tbh...

I mean, many of the "tools" in fed are archaic compared to corporate meaning, they aren't costing much in regards to licensing. The physical equipment we have is miniscule, the licensing for software and/or hardware is tiny, fed teams are already tiny af as it is.

So no, while not immune to layoffs, you are very much less likely to be affected. For me personally, the handful of people who have been "let go" were not due to WFR but rather having been fired.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @14x+1k19q8bt2

@af It's not a false narrative at all. I've been in FED since it's beginning and work closely with essentially EVERY team in Fed minus the sales group and, can count on one hand the number of people who have been let go.

Of course people are let go in fed. Not saying they aren't, or are immune to it but, it's just less likely considering fed can't be outsourced and the fact that the entire fed department is only 1600 people. We don't cost much money and ironically, fed sales brings in a SH-T ton of money.

To top that off, several groups such as IT, sales, security and even devs to an extent, know a lot of sensitive information that could be disastrous if a bitter employee were to leak all that upon being let go. This is government info. Network layouts, IP address's, what kind of programs they are running, etc etc etc... Agencies such as DoD, DoE, ARMY, Navy, etc... wouldn't be too thrilled about that is my guess and would quickly end contracts with Dell.

As for the NDA cr-p, that project is nothing special. I know everything about it and IMO I find it silly that it's even an NDA to begin with tbh. I'm under the NDA so I can't and won't say anything about it but what I will say, is that it's not very interesting nor is it something that will cost anybody a job.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @14w+1k19q8bt2

Please stop pushing this false narrative. 2/3 of those dismissed from my team during the last round of layoffs were fed and a couple of those had just recently completed an even more rigorous set of background checks for a super hush hush federal contract.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1k19q8bt2

I’m Fed and I’ve seen a number of layoffs in the past year or so. Immune to layoffs is a myth.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1k19q8bt2

@a1 I mean, to work in the Federal space at at Dell, you literally have to be a US citizen... and it's been that way since the Fed department was created lol. Trump has nothing to do with anything but, it's kinda sad that you think it does.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1k19q8bt2

@a1 Does it matter though? Mike kissed bidens a-s and even ate it out for years and look where that got him... Either way, who tf cares if Mike kissed "trumpys" a-s? I'd prefer to havce a job that I hate than not have one at all.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1k19q8bt2

Probably doesn't hurt that Mikey kissed Trumpy's A$$ to insure that he didn't cancel Dell's Federal contracts.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1k19q8bt2

Post a reply

: