Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

This is Pat’s legacy

Reminder that Intel was run into the ground by this clown.

by
| 1843 views | | 21 replies (last July 9) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jzn5kpbx

21 replies (most recent on top)

Where is spider Pat?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cc+1jzn5kpbx

I think you mean BK, not PG

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bd+1jzn5kpbx

Pat still living rent free in people's heads........pathetic!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bc+1jzn5kpbx

@ab Communication was loose? More like he had verbal f**king diarrhea! Creepy MF!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @at+1jzn5kpbx

Wild that there are still some Pat true believers. Sure, Intel was already burning down from a decade of bad leadership before he came back, but he poured kerosene all over the fire. He talked and acted as if Intel was still the company it was in 1997. Maybe that viewpoint resonated with some overly romantic employees, but it was wholly inappropriate for pulling a company out of a death spiral.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @as+1jzn5kpbx

Pat has a very long and very skinny slender weiner. It looks like an old witches finger. Look at him. Try to picture it. You can see it in your mind’s eye.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aq+1jzn5kpbx

Innovators Dilemma

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ak+1jzn5kpbx

Who cares how Intel got here. At this point does it really matter? You can't go back and fix it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aj+1jzn5kpbx

I liked Pat

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ah+1jzn5kpbx

Gentle reminder that Bob Swan throttled R&D and capital investment and pumped tens of billions into stock buybacks and dividend increases, then dipped the moment his hiring stock vested. If we'd invested in process, product and capacity at that time instead we would not be here.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ag+1jzn5kpbx

@ac was a dud since we got in the game late. We also needed to spend to gain capacity. Tsmc towers over us in terms of capacity

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1jzn5kpbx

Pat broke the balance sheet with reckless spending and reduced the value of the stock from 50 to 20.

IFS is a dud and cost billions that will be written off.

These are inconvenient facts.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1jzn5kpbx

If Pat had done what LBT is now doing, he might still be CEO, but his communication style was far too loose for a company that is struggling like Intel.

To repeatedly promise things that he was told internally could not happen, would get any CEO pushed out. The Board bought off on what he was doing so shares the blame in any case.

That said, to go on and on about him is just trolling. Time to move on.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ab+1jzn5kpbx

It’s not entirely Pats fault. Intel’s downfall started a long time ago. It started when Intel was walking around town with a puffed chest, like they were hot Sh!t. Now we are just a pile of cold diarrhea 💩

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1jzn5kpbx

It was long before Pat starting with Paul and then BK and the attitude that inetel was better than everyone and thinking customers would always want the intel product. That lead to never wanting to be a foundry and setting intel behind to the rest of the world.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1jzn5kpbx

@OP pi-s off mate

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1jzn5kpbx

He was part of the problem to begin with and the board hired him back. Not a good look for Intel.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1jzn5kpbx

@a5 still believes Intel is going to turn it around with 14A

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1jzn5kpbx

OP is still pretty worked up about Pat stopping by his cube and walking away with his red stapler.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1jzn5kpbx

Legacy back fr d-mb PSO and BK who can’t keep it in his pants with primary enabler chairman AB

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1jzn5kpbx

Post a reply

: