Is it against the code of conduct for an employee to input Truist proprietary information into an AI platform like ChatGPT? To my knowledge, the only AI tool currently authorized at Truist is CoPilot, and it’s being tested by a limited group of employees. A colleague of mine consistently distributes detailed meeting notes within five minutes of discussion, which strongly suggests AI assistance. Since this colleague works remotely, it’s likely they use a personal computer to access ChatGPT and then send the notes to their Truist email. I suspect this could breach the code of conduct, but I’d appreciate any insights or clarifications from others.
12 replies (most recent on top)
This seems to be a post designed at savoring an innovative teammate. Also Microsoft Teams has RTT that takes notes during a meeting. Talk to your teammate and inquire about the note taking via teams. So ready to assume the worse about a teammate. Where is the trust that Truist believes in? One team? This is unhealthy competition. Don’t blame you though, this environment was created by leadership. The way we preach trust, yet micromanage from the top is contradictory. Teammates are all we have. We make the sausage. Rely on one another to become better.
Narc
"Doing my job as a data and risk steward to protect the bank. I've been working with ChatGPT for long enough to spot when someone's relying on an AI tool."
You are full of sh*t. AI "detectors" do not work.
https://help.openai.com/en/articles/8313351-how-can-educators-respond-to-students-presenting-ai-generated-content-as-their-own
"Do AI detectors work? In short, not in our experience."
Just like cr--s in a bucket, when one starts to crawl out the top and get away the others pull them back down. Truist personified.
Wage slaves arguing over Truist policies. Market top is in!!!!!
@GetaLife - Wow, genius move — feeding proprietary data into an unapproved AI tool and emailing it to your Truist account? That’s next-level reckless. It’s almost like you want to get flagged for a Code of Ethics violation. But hey, I’m sure Cybersecurity and Risk have nothing better to do than investigate that kind of blatant stupidity.
Well obviously Mr. Data and Risk Steward, quickly providing well-organized notes with breakdowns, competitor insights, and industry standards cannot be tolerated. Teammates that take initiative and leverage capabilities available everywhere, except Truist, should be written up, reported, and penalized. Must be nice to have a position that does not require any actual work other than monitoring how quickly and accurately someone can produce something of value.
It’s not this person’s fault that Truist decided to set all of that Foundry money on fire rather than invest in developing internal AI tools when it was affordable to do so.
Not a malevolent. Doing my job as a data and risk steward to protect the bank. I've been working with ChatGPT for long enough to spot when someone's relying on an AI tool. They’ll drop a whole page of well-organized notes with breakdowns, competitor insights, and industry standards, all in 5-10 minutes after a quick chat in a meeting. It's pretty clear they're leveraging AI for that level of speed and detail.
Have you stopped to consider that the person is taking notes during the meeting?
Are you some kind of malevolent?
But thank you for pointing out that it is the SPEED with which they send out meeting notes rather than on the content.
I will start waiting a few hours before sending out meeting notes.
Yep, report it.