Thread regarding Ford layoffs

MI Job Market Stalls in Early Faulty Spring: Unemployment Climbs to 5.5% as Consumer Sentiment Hits Multi‑Year Lows

Lansing, April 18, 2025 — Michigan’s labor market showed further signs of strain in March, with the state’s seasonally adjusted unemployment rate rising for the third consecutive month to 5.5%, up from 5.4% in February and well above 4.2% in March 2024, according to data released April 17 by the Michigan Department of Technology, Management & Budget (DTMB).

Sector Breakdown

  • Manufacturing shed 5,000 jobs in March, dropping from 611,000 to 606,000, the largest percentage decline among major industries.
  • Professional & Business Services lost 4,000 positions over the same period.

Workforce Gains Mask Underlying Weakness
Despite a modest 6,000‑job gain in total employment from January to February, the surge of newly unemployed workers (also 6,000) left net hiring at zero and swelled Michigan’s unemployment rolls to 274,000 in March—70,000 more than a year earlier.

“March’s data underscores a cautious business climate,” said Wayne Rourke, labor market information director for Michigan’s Center for Data & Analytics. “Employers remain hesitant to add staff amid lingering tariff uncertainty and slowing national growth.”

Consumer Confidence Plummets
Adding to the dour labor readings, the University of Michigan’s April preliminary Consumer Sentiment Index plunged to 50.8, its lowest level in over a decade, down 34% year‑over‑year. Key sub‑indices tumbled as well:

  • Current Conditions: 56.5 (–28.5% Y‑Y)
  • Expectations: 47.2 (–37.9% Y‑Y)

A striking 67% of survey respondents now anticipate higher unemployment over the year ahead—more than double November’s level and the highest share since 2009—while year‑ahead inflation expectations spiked to 6.7%, the strongest reading since 1981.

Outlook
Economists warn that without a turnaround in both hiring and consumer psychology, Michigan’s slow job growth—forecast at just 30,200 new positions in 2025—may fall short of pushing the unemployment rate below 5% this year.

In conclusion, the state’s rising unemployment rate, coupled with declining consumer sentiment and industry-specific challenges, underscores the necessity for policymakers to rethink traditional approaches. A stronger emphasis on supporting genuine talent and innovation—beyond traditional metrics of academic achievement or bureaucratic norms—may be essential in reversing Michigan’s current economic trajectory and fostering a resilient, adaptable economy. Over-reliance on established industries alone appears ineffective, as does the current approach to addressing challenges in higher education and protecting the dignity of emerging talent. Additionally, the noticeable lack of "a sense of urgency," driven by insufficient accountability for misdirection, often leads to counterproductive blame-shifting, prolonging resolution and exacerbating harm to genuine talent. Addressing anti-intellectual attitudes, reducing cynicism among stakeholders, and ensuring direct access to decision-makers for non-traditional talent are essential steps forward. Michigan must take immediate action to prevent ongoing brain drain by creating an inclusive and supportive environment that truly values innovation and authenticity. Empowering and respecting innovators, rather than exploiting or marginalizing them, is essential for building a resilient, dynamic economy that retains and attracts the talent necessary for Michigan’s sustained economic growth. A heightened sense of urgency is crucial in addressing these issues promptly, as delaying resolutions could result in prolonged negative impacts far beyond the tenure of the current Michigan administration. Can being kicked down an never ending road. Instead of handling things, a common pattern seems to be blaming the other and letting beliefs become self-fulfilling to justify such. When will we stop playing blame game and pick up the can. We can do it!

by
| 1071 views | | 9 replies (last April 21, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1js4p7ew6

9 replies (most recent on top)

The storm. It's coming....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qg+1js4p7ew6

spot.

“If Missouri’s farm families want to buy a new American-made Ford F-150 FFV that runs on American-made fuel, they can’t,” said Brad Schad the CEO of the Missouri Corn Growers Association “Ford no longer offers this option on any vehicle. If, as the Ford slogan claims, their trucks are Built For America, the company is turning away from its roots and ignoring the largest group of Americans that buy them.”

Ford Motor Company’s decision to transition away from ethanol flex-fuel vehicles poses a significant threat to Missouri’s vital corn industry, which ranks among the top corn-producing states in the U.S., generating approximately 600 million bushels annually. Corn is not only the most widely cultivated crop in Missouri but also accounts for about 30% of the state’s total agricultural revenue, underscoring its importance to both local farmers and the broader economy.

Moreover, Ford’s shift away from flex fuel could reduce demand for Missouri corn, jeopardizing thousands of agricultural jobs and harming the economic stability of rural communities that depend on this critical crop.

The change could also deter investment in Missouri’s agriculture. As the company focuses on alternative fuels and electric vehicles, reduced emphasis on flex-fuel options may lead to less investment in ethanol-related infrastructure and production.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @k3+1js4p7ew6

@ comment below me

I know you don’t like democrats, but you should read this. Idk if the writer is democrat, just guessing. I’m neither. Pretty interesting read though.

https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/2024.03.13-chair-khan-remarks-at-the-carnegie-endowment-for-intl-peace.pdf

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c6+1js4p7ew6

Now ford has the power..
Vendor lock the state from the grid baby muahahahahahahahahahajahhahahahahahahahahahaha

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c5+1js4p7ew6

Wym ? Dte just partnered with ford on a park!

See partnerships happen! Didn’t a high level friend at ford move to dte last year? Around this time?

Team, work!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c4+1js4p7ew6

@a6+1js4p7ew6 Credit is only for those who take. Not give. Reciprocity is not a given. Learn selection in environments. You can find an environment where there is a fixed rate of reciprocity. But not here

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @an+1js4p7ew6

Going to get worse. Massive salaried layoffs are coming for both GM and Ford.

Good luck, y'all!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ab+1js4p7ew6

@a6+1js4p7ew6 - NiYa, common sense (of urgency)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1js4p7ew6

Oscillating behavior signals fragility in structure. It seems unconducive to change. A risk-averse or change-resistant culture, whether in local government, corporations, or academia, makes it harder to pivot toward new strategies or industries. Unless you tackle those mismatches, you’ll keep seeing a zero‑sum dance. If manufacturing, for instance, competes with tech for talent without broader synergy, it creates internal tensions rather than overall progress. True growth often requires cross-sector collaboration and an attitude that new ideas can expand the pie, rather than simply re-dividing it.

My consulting advice:

  • Expand state and federal oversight, so employers who habitually underpay or overwork highly experienced young workers face real consequences—fines, public listings, or restricted access to state contracts.
  • When schools team up with employers (e.g., for capstone projects, co‑ops), they can set explicit rules for fair wages and job expectations, ensuring students and new highly gifted and unique grads aren’t just “cheap labor.”
  • Strengthen legal protections for workers who report exploitative or abusive practices, ensuring they don’t lose future opportunities for speaking out. Full force of law combined with a sense of urgency as they are in the prime moments of their lives.

Give innovators their own watchdog

Close the legal loopholes that let firms undervalue early‑career yet highly experienced talent. Whether that’s venture or company related, depending on their needs.

Have leaders study “silenced no more act” from cali.

Punish “try us in court” tactics.

Make sure the state AG cares or the entire ecosystem will abuse, alienate, discard, cover up.

No more ghostwriting and stealing intellect from talent.

Have Michigan leaders study New Yorks human rights laws.

Increase fines and criminal penalties when employers misclassify, underpay, or otherwise exploit young and highly experienced workers. Matrix vicarious liability WITH individual liability.

Strengthen anti‑discrimination enforcement around “new‑school” methods (e.g. remote work, portfolio over pedigree), giving innovators legal recourse when exploited or judged purely for their non‑traditional background despite being more qualified and equipped. AKA REVERSE AGEISM.

Provide a rapid‑response labor ombudsman or online tribunal for young highly experience talent to flag exploitative condition—so they can get an interim injunction on unfair practices while their case is heard. This prevents brain development liability which brings me to my next point…. establish laws that penalize mishandling that leads to prolonged trauma during brain development of younger talent, this is insurance for highly experienced and attuned individuals that feel safe within Michigan.

If you listen, you will become the state where brilliant young people know three things:

  • My ideas won’t be buried by NDAs or non‑competes… or be rejected and covertly passed to someone older who lacks that same intimate level of experience and execution.
  • If someone exploits me, I can get an injunction in days, not years.
  • Cross‑sector or siloed labs guarantee I won’t have to choose between manufacturing tradition and tech innovation to be part of the community / ecosystem.

Encourage educational institutions and partner employers and entrepreneurial ecosystem to value demonstrated competence (e.g., portfolios, projects) ABOVE those with credentials such as workforce tenure or academic degrees. Punish institutions that encourage cynicism, alienation, and jealousy… they will ki-l your pipeline and hope for talent.

Outlineyoung and highly experienced performance—and any resulting IP—will be assessed and credited, preventing hidden “ghostwriting” or intellectual theft.

Provide private right of action + treble damages to deter gate‑keeping cultures. Having to publicly fight for things humiliates raw unique talent, it emasculates their skills to external factors and pushes them away.

Punish forced collaboration that punishes individual skill and aptitude and encourages participation while minimizing and hiding talent in efforts to subdue them under the claw of bad actors.

This will shift the landscape from a zero-sum mindset to an inclusive, high-value ecosystem will attract and retain bright, ambitious minds who will spur sustainable economic growth and innovation for years to come. Companies will come in playing tug of war by the droves. It will also inspire our “young men” Whitmer keeps talking about🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ by giving them young men to be inspired by (duhhhh). This advice does not include what needs to be done to education system. That’s another beast.. Also don’t watch adolescence and be brainwashed containing a lack of urgency. It’s easy to blanket problems through sensationalism.

Don’t forget to give credit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1js4p7ew6

Post a reply

: