Is there any truth to the rumor that people who received inconsistent performance rating last year due to not following in-office adherence will be laid off? I am on a very small team and I believe I am the only one on my team who got an IP so I’m freaking out. My role is a grade level 3 phone role.
8 replies (most recent on top)
They'll never tell you the formula - I was in a group where 50% was told relocate or no job. The others not touched. They were trying to force the ones asked to move out. The ones that did move - many were rif'd within a year after the move. They have no compassion - none. No one got a real explanation on why they chose who was to stay but I think they decided who they wanted out and hoped they wouldn't take the relocation offer
IPs, SP-, and connect week policy was a part of the algorithm that was used.
I hope so!!
@a5 it makes all the sense.
High performer means more bonus, money, chairman shares.
They become "expensive" while doing job of 4 people.
Fidelity always finds creative ways to penalize such associates while promoting mediocre IP folks
@a5 it is true
Just ask what happened with UMH last time.
Only high performers got impacted while pencil pusher annoying folks got assigned to new team just because of location preference
Phones probably won’t be impacted, it seems like tech and unqualified VPs.
@a4 That makes zero sense, why would you post information if you’re not actually aware. People are scared for their jobs right now is not the time to just spew sh-t
Nope, just a bunch of lies.
They always get rid of EP’s as they’re expected to “land on their feet”.
It’s easy to push IP around instead of incentivizing EP.