Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

The semantics are such a waste. The issue at Intel is you don't care to measure what matters and so you are running blind in so many critical places and have not spent the time or engineering to match your competitors capabilities. You can't reduce what you don't measure or can't see. And your SPC rules prevent anyone from developing good detectability to avoid work. lazy POS...

Op hasn’t a clue what def met does and how it is a vital part of process health and improvements

@gr

It’s long over due

Why dont they just fired them at this point? This buzz has been around for a little while now but no one has been removed.. so what gives?

Isn’t this about the guy who claims to be making a lot of money on previous posts? I am so lost on what’s going on here. IRL I heard of some potential coverups and weird things going on within the team that get ignored.

Oh, we’re gonna act like we know how to run modern fab process now and discuss it right here on the layoff board? To fu-k’n late. Not to mention that even if we had a clue how to run a fab the rest of our company is also a sh-t show.

@ac, spot on!!

@a4 it would be if most of DefMet wasn’t filled with mo--ns who just wanted to escape the in-person fab life. Most are totally brain dead and make incorrect conclusions frequently and bog down the efforts of process development

I don't believe OP understands this is not a DefMet site.

Defmet finds and classifies defects and process and equipment engineering use the data collected to find and resolve issues. It’s actually a pretty efficient process.