Thread regarding Truist Bank layoffs

Micromanagement vs Autonomy — The Difference in Results Is Obvious

One thing I genuinely appreciate about my team at Truist is the leadership style in our organization. Our leaders trust us to do our jobs. There’s no constant hovering or minute-by-minute monitoring. We’re given autonomy, clear expectations, and ultimately we’re judged on the results we deliver.

What’s interesting is when you compare that to some of the cross-functional groups we work with. Their leadership approach couldn’t be more different. From what I’ve seen, it’s a lot of micromanaging and tracking every hour people spend on their laptops.

And honestly, the outcomes speak for themselves. That group seems to struggle far more just getting basic things done, and the results simply aren’t there. Our clients are the ones that pay the price for this!

It really reinforces a pretty simple lesson: when leaders don’t trust their teams and try to control every detail, it usually backfires. Autonomy and accountability drive performance. Micromanagement just slows everything down.


by
| 2 views | | 3 replies (last March 14) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kkm0mhyh

3 replies (most recent on top)

Written by AI

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bv+1kkm0mhyh

@a2 I agree. I've seen where managers will let you do your work, quietly obtain your weekly updates, and secretly take credit for your work. The disconnect between skip level managers and employees allows this to happen. And nobody's the wiser.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bm+1kkm0mhyh

@OP This really depends on LOB and manager. I'm glad you are in an area where it is like this. Be mindful that credit is still not given where it is due. I've seen managers take full credit and bonuses purely off of my autonomy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1kkm0mhyh

Post a reply

: