Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

What happened to Intel?

Not an employee or troll and really want why is Intel struggling? Can you put your finger on a particular event or it’s just a multiple of factors?

by
| 1411 views | | 20 replies (last June 18, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jxwwd62w

20 replies (most recent on top)

Tooo many h1bs!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jd+1jxwwd62w

Typical of older bigger companies treating their IP as a cash cow and not innovating. Outsourcing technology also allowed 3rd world countries to leap frog forward. Combined with an ever lazier western workforce it was inevitable.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fy+1jxwwd62w

Human nature

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bt+1jxwwd62w

Greed. Sloth. Pride. Gluttony.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bg+1jxwwd62w

@am
When Intel stuck on 14nm the core of innovation (FAB Process) the industry and world walked on by. When Intel lead the industry by 1-2 nodes the innovation trickled down into each and every group. IBM in those times always had a small lead but never at high enough volumes to supply the industry.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bf+1jxwwd62w

@OP: BK and DEI happened.... those 2 things put Intel into a fatal tailspin.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @be+1jxwwd62w

What happened or is happening? Either way, a long line of bad CEOs, including the new one.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @am+1jxwwd62w

You know that person in the BMW who cuts you off and changes lanes without using turn signals? Intel is full of them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ak+1jxwwd62w

Intel became a balance sheet company. More concerned with short term profit than true innovation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ah+1jxwwd62w

Obvious Troll Post.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ag+1jxwwd62w

One word covers it all. Complacency

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1jxwwd62w

DEI was the plan - what could go wrong?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1jxwwd62w

Keeping copy exact past when it made business sense

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1jxwwd62w

Late to EUV, which destroyed 10nm timeframes and manufacturability. TD owning everything meant no priority given to wafer cost or throughput. Only yield mattered, yield neutral changes were blocked no matter how significant the benefit to other vectors.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1jxwwd62w

Poor CEO choices from Otellini on. The Board? We will see how Lip-Bu Tan does. I have more hope in him than I had in the last three.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1jxwwd62w

Inappropriate relationships at work.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1jxwwd62w

Google: "Intel is facing challenges due to several factors, including increased competition from AMD, Nvidia, and ARM, manufacturing delays, and strategic missteps in areas like AI and mobile computing. These issues have led to a decline in market share, share price, and overall company performance. "

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1jxwwd62w

@OP
Most employees from top to bottom thought it is fine to do bare minimum work not to get fired and “hoping” other people will work smarter and harder to keep their paycheck going.
Fast forward few years later the products started to show that they were no longer competitive and competition caught up.
It is not easy to give up the mentality to slack once it is a habit.
Most people who were doing actual work and heavy lifting already moved on.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1jxwwd62w

@OP Google is your friend.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1jxwwd62w

Post a reply

: