Thread regarding Baker Hughes layoffs

Who will be responsible?

Will BH be responsible in case someone has bad side effects from the vaccine that is a condition to keep the job?

by
| 2633 views | | 16 replies (last August 18, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1ckb5rzk

16 replies (most recent on top)

Not to everyone.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4gvd+1ckb5rzk

No such email has been released concerning mandated vaccines.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4pwb+1ckb5rzk

So far in the us, there has been 37million cases of covid resulting in 620 thousand fatalities.

Of the 192 million people receiving at least one dose of vaccine, there has been zero deaths attributed to any vaccine.

Grow up. People are dying. Get vaccinated.

Figure it out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3rql+1ckb5rzk

Email just came out…. You will vaccinated by October 15.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ijj+1ckb5rzk

BH is where the medical students learn the ropes apparently. The BH medical handbook teaches that the vaccine is no good, incubates future strains and weakens your immune system...

Nonce! Take the vaccine and move on. Not telling you to go into Afghanistan to fight another war. Its a jab in the arm, thats it. Folk have died and all you moan about is how YOU feel, not conforming or being lied to by governments or medical experts. Talk to the families who've lost loved ones or watch some TV. See how folk can't breath! I really fear for the future generations if we're really arguing about a jab in the arm.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3rlk+1ckb5rzk

Man shut up and get the vaccine . Some of y’all just look for a reason to be mad or against anything smh 🤦🏽‍♂️

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ziv+1ckb5rzk

Every single virologist worth their salt has taken the vaccine. Every scientist, everybody with a functioning brain.

It protects against the virus, somewhere in the region of 97%. No vaccine is 100% effective, but breakthrough cases are mild and have a shorter duration.

Reducing the number of infected and the duration of infection will severely limit the potential for mutation.

As a civilization we have used vaccines for over two hundred years. We’ve eliminated small pox and diseases that used to stalk mankind, such as measles, are now rare occurrences.

Take off your tinfoil hat, stop listening to Alex Jones, and go get a vaccine like an adult.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2qyi+1ckb5rzk

@2lfk+1ckb5rzk

There you go appealing to authority. What happened to science? I don’t give a sh-t who has the vaccine, it does not protect you from anything. You still get it, still can transmit it, still can die from it and worse you mutate it. You vaxxtards are the ones making it worse by incubating new strains in your bodies. Enjoy your bi-annual booster shots and ADE.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2jky+1ckb5rzk

Each person has the right to decide for themselves rather or not they get the jab. Nobody should have the right to decide for someone else unless a decision is being made for a child.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2euf+1ckb5rzk

Nobody has mandated anything yet that I have seen.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ran+1ckb5rzk

It doesn’t matter what contracts you signed with Baker, you can still sue the company. If a manager discriminates, harasses, bullies, se-----y harass, retaliates, defamations your name, or breaks any local, state or federal law, all contracts are void. You can even sue Baker if they require you to sign noncompete as a contingency of severance, and you can even sue for more if they try to word language tricking you into believing otherwise. No competition is a basis of shareholding.
If Baker requires vaccinations to work and you get a life changing affect of the vaccine. Your better off suing the pharmaceutical company. They are worth more than Baker could ever imagine. Just get confirmation on the brand of vaccine your getting in writing.

In short, Baker doesn’t have enough clout to make any legally binding determinations about anything and you shouldn’t treat them as if they do.

There are a lot of life changing decisions for everyone. Good luck and I wish you the best.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1msx+1ckb5rzk

If an employer forces an employee to be vaccinated against his will and that employee has an adverse reaction to the vaccine then i would think the employee would be able to sue, and rightly so.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rcs+1ckb5rzk

Who knew so many Baker employees knew so much about medicine and any 'negative' side affects from the vaccine. There's hope for a new career yet for you all...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bvn+1ckb5rzk

Not sure why people are so worried about negative side effects from the vaccine.

I have only experienced the positive side effects from taking the vaccine, which includes a dramatic increase in performance in my phone and internet. However, the one that totally baffles me is my increased performance without any ED medications. Does any of the brilliant minds from BKR have a logical explanation for this strange occurrence?

Really hoping that none of the little blue pills that I flushed down the toilet does not create some catastrophic damage in the oceans like a population explosion in sea life!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xgl+1ckb5rzk

Responsibility and BH are you kidding me they will find someone else to blame I assure you it won’t be managements fault

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aaz+1ckb5rzk

Has it already been decided that the will mandate it?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tfs+1ckb5rzk

Post a reply

: