Thread regarding Cargill layoffs

Happy I left. Never looked back.

Had a 20+y sales career. Cargill crapped the bed during DMac era….look at annual returns of your Cargill stock if in doubt.

Still have a few friends there and follow the company. Unfortunately, there is little groundbreaking. Lack of innovation. Stagnant leadership.

Above average company at trading commodities. Year after year Cargill produces piles of “stuff” then hatch a plan how to sell it. Despite the rhetoric, I can vouch Cargill does not care about the vast majority of customers. “Tons R us” mentality.

It’s no longer an organization to build a long career. Join out of school, then work 3-5y. Learn all you can then jump ship. You’ll make significantly more money elsewhere. Cargill is frugal.

by
| 3392 views | | 9 replies (last July 24) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jzpzfmtm

9 replies (most recent on top)

I’ve watched with sadness and concern as Cargill laid off 8,000 employees globally. While restructuring may be part of business realities, the way it unfolded speaks volumes about a deeper shift — one where people, once at the heart of company culture, now feel pushed to the periphery.
I spent over a decade working across regions and businesses, proud to be part of a company that placed values and people first. Today, I hear from those who remain — brilliant professionals carrying increased workloads, silent anxiety, and a sense of disconnection. The psychological toll is real, yet rarely acknowledged.
And now, more subtle signals are emerging. Employees are being told not to speak about "sustainability commitments" — only "goals." It's a fascinating, and troubling, reflection of how companies may shift language and posture based on political tides. This kind of opportunism not only dilutes the purpose behind ESG but also undermines the people working tirelessly to honor it.
Culture is not built by mission statements — it lives in how people are treated when things get difficult. It's heartbreaking to see a company with strong values shake the morale of its workforce so profoundly.
Sustainability is not just environmental — it’s emotional, organizational, human.
Let’s talk about how we rebuild trust, care, and integrity. For the sake of every person still showing up, silently wondering if they matter.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2db+1jzpzfmtm

@1x4 Yes! If you don't act as an owner you will be evaluated badly. This company is a joke!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2bt+1jzpzfmtm

Depends on function. Some functions were more strict on 10/70/20 low/avg/high.

Yes you will get less base pay as you get higher in the range. That money will go to other lower in the range people.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @226+1jzpzfmtm

@1x4 I have no idea, haven’t had my comp discussion yet, which is odd. In past FY’s that has been done by now. I wouldn’t be surprised if raises are quite meager this year.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1y8+1jzpzfmtm

Does anyone have insight into the performance review process? Are they required to give a low score to a specific percentage of team members? Would they attempt to make pay more equal by not giving raises to people earning more?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1x4+1jzpzfmtm

Agreed. Terrible place to work in a passive aggressive way. Glad to be out too

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1px+1jzpzfmtm

The biggest barrier is the leadership basically just rotates among themselves and takes care of their own. This is why they no longer reflect the leadership of the growing food companies they so desperately want to connect with. For younger leaders, this is not the place to grow your career. Lot of other amazing places to work where age and less tenure and differences of opinion are better respected and taken at face value vs Cargill’s close minded culture.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wy+1jzpzfmtm

There are innovators. They come get frustrated and leave.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kv+1jzpzfmtm

Agreed. Terrible place to work if you're not in commodity trading.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fx+1jzpzfmtm

Post a reply

: