Thread regarding VMware layoffs

Will VMW continue the BC plans?

  1. You have a majority of the company who did not get offers.
  2. You have slowed new business and renewals of existing deals
  3. You have decimated the core sales teams and specialists and presales SEs, in my patch 20% retained with 80% no offer, fu-k Q4 numbers.
  4. There is confusion and uncertainty around the go forward strategy and products so even if you were bought in, you can’t be credible selling big deals.

If BC does not go through, them sending those offers effectively imploded our business versus if they simply did not do this.

No direction
No leaders
No sales
No inspired staff
Sh-t creek no paddle

Will VMware simply proceed and adopt BCs proposed org chart? I don’t think it’s that simple.

by
| 2822 views | | 18 replies (last November 10, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1ppMTyqh

18 replies (most recent on top)

HyperCloud for the win, no make the supercloud, no make that devopsaihypersupercloud!!

For Fs sake, give it up vmware.

Just be virtzilla, accept your identity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7vjk+1ppMTyqh

Dell and SilverLake will hire Tom Krause as CEO

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7emn+1ppMTyqh

@1hmu+1ppMTyqh Very correct, VMware has to stop trying to create imposed hypetrains but rather work on the legacy, and also this is just where I don't agree with you, focus on the hybrid cloud model by merging various stacks that supposedly try to do the same thing.

This however requires a lot of fat trimming, introducing accountability, reducing elitism, and not letting the minority handle the bulk of the load within the R&D teams that is brewing for years now.

Filling one's day back to back with meetings where no work is done and a very suboptimal solution is not a job. And I have to say this, And this is done predominantly by the senior management which tends to cost more. I would have wished for a brighter future where humans only took decisions without getting their hands dirty but this is not a fairy tale, this is the real world.

The deal, that would be more likely to be closed which is assumed by the people who has the enough resolution of understanding of the world, will provide an extra buffer if 1.5 billion $ of which can provide VMware with enough time, resources to take the actions I have mentioned above .

I don't, however, think that it will be the case and rather will take half baked decisions that will achieve 30-40 percent of what Broadcom would otherwise achieve.

It's a numbers game, finance is brutal and not utilitarian but I didn't invent the current system and these are the facts.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7blt+1ppMTyqh

If the deal with BC fails, VMware will be sold to other companies piece by piece. Basically, it's the same thing Uncle Tan intended to do.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1uue+1ppMTyqh

OTOH, VMW was doomed to fail on it's own.
The cloud and cloud native strategies have failed over and over again, both because of inept management but also because of the strength of the ESX mafia and the mantra of keeping ESX included everywhere. Stacking things on top of ESX just isnt viable from a cost or technical standpoint in today's world.
Add bloated BUs, a bunch of DEI and OCTO fairy tales and a workforce where a lot of top talent has left and the future outlook was already very bleak.
Trimming a lot of the fat, abandoning the cloud and cloud native money pits and focusing on squeezing out maximum $$$ from the on-prem we-cant-migrate-away-from-ESX crowd is really the only play that makes sense. Squeeze out as much as possible for as long as possible.
Broadcom was the best thing that could happen to VMW. It will mean that the company will stay alive for longer than it would on its own.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hmu+1ppMTyqh

“ There is no going back. You can never go home again.”

I go to the office everyday. And everyday I go back home.

Do not buy in to the lie. The cake isn’t real.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ctt+1ppMTyqh

VMware has no shot at cloud anything. The cost of VMware on top of the already high native cloud prices has made it non viable from the beginning. Hock would have discovered the same thing that Pat G did: that it will take ten billion or more to get a competitive footing in cloud. VMware is legacy datacenter. That is what Hock plans to profit from for years. That is it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zrs+1ppMTyqh

If the deal doesn’t close VMW will have to run a similar playbook. s***show either way.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wgl+1ppMTyqh

I don’t think earnings will be an issue for a recovery period if the deal crashes and burns. That is precisely why Broadcom would have to pay the 1.5 billion fee. Thats basically a year of VMW net income. They’ll spread that over the next few Q to cover losses caused by this and keep chugging along.

I do think however, that it will impact the overall strategy at VMW. The only thing I like about the BC deal was the notion that it would move VMW into a hybrid cloud space. VMW can’t beat GCP or AWS, but it can make I SUPER EASY to buy some elastic capacity from the services division and push your workloads across as needed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @awz+1ppMTyqh

There is no going back. You can never go home again. That's not the way any of this works. The damage has been done. VMW employees are demoralized. Sales staff is decimated. Software developers are steering a rudderless course into a sea of uncertainty. The company's revenue will take a huge hit.

MD will start shopping VMW to PE firms, probably piecemeal. Layoffs will be announced again, but likely with a different set of people in the group kicked to the curb. The cycle will start over again. Stop surfing The Layoff and get looking for a new job... said the guy surfing The Layoff.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @soe+1ppMTyqh

No money to be made. Core sales here with BCOM offer. Not really sure when or how we get back to normal. Next 6 months will be ki-ler. Hope the incentives are there to retain some of us and make it through the next 2 or 3 quarters.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uio+1ppMTyqh

You literally can’t make this sh-t up. Clowns

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qyn+1ppMTyqh

I expect the deal to fail and i expect VMware to become a dumpster fire.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lga+1ppMTyqh

lol comparing to Qualcomm - they didnt want to be taken over, acted like the deal was done or pre-emptively laid anyone off

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @shw+1ppMTyqh

Just like Qualcomm crashed and burned after Trump saved them from the layoffs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wll+1ppMTyqh

If the deal does not close, I can imagine the embarrassment in the Q4 earnings call when analysts start asking about company strategy and products roadmaps to Magoo and the puppet CFO. They will be looking at their shoes thinking of the $50M that did not happen while the Wall Street press has a feast for the ages. Not good to be a VMware employee if the deal does not close.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qlc+1ppMTyqh

its hard to believe there are people who want the deal to fail thinking everything will 'return to normal'

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dgq+1ppMTyqh

It’s pretty messed up. Not much money gonna be made at this rate.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nlq+1ppMTyqh

Post a reply

: