Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Folsom campus to be sold

Folsom campus for sale from Q1 2025. Current employees encouraged to WFH and will be accommodated in small buildings which will be leased.

by
| 4224 views | | 27 replies (last November 26, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1vCytFfS

27 replies (most recent on top)

Samsung just announced plans for new R&D in Folsom. Intel should sell the site to them and move into some leased space down by the river or prison

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4rdl+1vCytFfS

Haha. Just the latest wave of greenhorn gold diggers who tried to get a foothold in the Sierra foothills.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3noi+1vCytFfS

They came out here in the 80’s by the thousands. Not one of um had any interest in cattle, a truck, western hat or belt buckle. Folsom was here before Intel came to town and we will be here long after it’s gone. Buy y’all.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3rdc+1vCytFfS

I'll be there to reminisce laugh and celebrate the day they finally take the Intel signs down. I remember a 2022 meeting with Gordon Moore where he told Pat, "Don't sc--w it up." Sadly, his advice seems to have been ignored.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3oek+1vCytFfS

what do you mean, 'you people'?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ugr+1vCytFfS

@1yng, what a silly thing to say. "Their kind"? You do understand the people of California don't behave or vote as a block, right? Half (possibly more) of the state is conservative.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3tkb+1vCytFfS

This site is history. No buyer is going to invest and lease back to Intel. Folsom is not a long term viable option for Intel. It is all long term old employees. They have not replenished headcount with college grads in Folsom for 5-7 years. Developers will tear the buildings down and build a 55 plus community. It might have viability as a hospital. Folsom site is doomed. Move to Oregon, Arizona or New Mexico if you want to ride the Intel Titanic down.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3fwv+1vCytFfS

I think lease-back is intended to unlock the value of the property, since there is quite a bit of unused real estate on that site (and many other campuses).

Surprised to read that HF is 50 acres. That one should just be sold, moving the labs to JF or FM.

The company labs have become a sprawling enterprise and some site consolidation would be good.

Still, can't help but think this is part of preparing to sell off divisions or potentially break up the entire company, if they continue to lose market share. It can be both a rational site consolidation AND the shedding of assets to clean up prior to a sale.

Arguably, x86 is past its peak and until the company, or its successors, move on to RISC-V (ARM is also getting old), then there will be less need for lab space as the total addressable x86 market shrinks (due to ARM PC and Datacenter market share gains).

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3qrf+1vCytFfS

It is trolling because the headline is trolling (for clicks)

The anonymity of this site causes it to be polluted with trolls, who think posting gloom and doom has some effect on the stock price.

It doesn't affect the stock price in any way, but it is an good example of the fact that about a third of the population are sociopaths.

Read the article and it is totally clear there is no intent to walk away from the campus.

Sale and lease back is very common.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2cnr+1vCytFfS

@1drx…wouldn’t Intel have to sell the property first before they could do a lease back? Maybe this isn’t a troll post and the fact is you are an id--t.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2jho+1vCytFfS

trolling abounds

Intel isn’t closing its Folsom site near Sacramento, one of its major operating hubs with around 5,000 employees. It says it wants to make more efficient use of the property, which consists of seven buildings and 1.6 million square feet of offices and labs.

“We are exploring more cost-effective space usage options for Intel’s Folsom site, including a partial lease back of our current space,” Intel said in its statement.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1drx+1vCytFfS

Sites in the US should have been consolidated long long ago..
I mean why be so spread out with huge campuses when companies such as MSFT, GOOG, AAPL, and now NVDA never ever pursued this model of multiple, huge campuses ?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1caa+1vCytFfS

It is a sign of getting closer to bankrupt.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1tja+1vCytFfS

@lmd
No, everyone in CA needs to stay there. We don't want their kind polluting other states. They already put theirs in the ground.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yng+1vCytFfS

https://www.oregonlive.com/silicon-forest/2024/11/intel-will-sell-150-acre-campus-in-california-assessing-future-of-50-acre-hillsboro-site.html

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fhf+1vCytFfS

Intel can sell this valuable space to Nvidia or AMD, or some of the other up and coming great companies around. there are many of them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xyn+1vCytFfS

It seems to be hard to find a buyer for it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rov+1vCytFfS

Link?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ydq+1vCytFfS

Just move out of CA already.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lmd+1vCytFfS

Currently they broke ground behind FM3 to put emulators in for the Foundry. Why so far from Ohio I don't know. 🤷‍♂️

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @omb+1vCytFfS

You could see this coming for decades.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oip+1vCytFfS

Good idea, Intel can hold yard sales at all the campuses to raise needed cash

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wgo+1vCytFfS

Yes, I confirm this news. All Folsom employees got a mail today about this news. Q1 2025 it will be made available for sale.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ymj+1vCytFfS

Yes, I am so saddened by this news. This campus has been shrinking since 2015 !

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zcn+1vCytFfS

https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/intel-invests-105m-in-data-center-tech-at-folsom-campus-in-california/

This post does not make sense.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rfr+1vCytFfS

Intel's Folsom campus, covering 236 acres ....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pvh+1vCytFfS

WFH is a very bad idea.
Everyone should be back to the office working.
No wonder things don't move.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ckr+1vCytFfS

Post a reply

: