Thread regarding Edward Jones layoffs

Downstream Impacts to Enterprise Reimagined

I am curious. How many of you who survived the layoffs and still come to this page are witnessing catastrophic consequences to leadership decisions to eliminate departments, capabilities or expertise? How many of these have serious regulatory components or are millimeters away from causing harm to our branch teams?

For example, a department was eliminated in Enterprise Learning that updates all the online learning modules. We can’t seem to get courses fixed in the learning management system that branch teams need to gain access to their branch desktop or other important applications. I know several associates who have tried to raise this issue but their leaders don’t care because they have “more important fish to fry.”

In another important area, data governance was eliminated so that our AI is now fishing in a corrupt pond of data. But the push to use AI in the home office is intense.

Records and Information management has completely disappeared. There are no guard rails, well, anywhere. And the firm just hit an iceberg. At least, that’s what it feels like.

What are you seeing?


by
| 3171 views | | 12 replies (last January 22) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kf215ayb

12 replies (most recent on top)

@b5 but yet they want RTO. They make no sense. Lets offshore work but force people to go in the office.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @17n+1kf215ayb

@14t at least one of those projects was led and executed by a big name 3rd party consulting company with entirely offshore Indian developers. I can't speak for both but imagine it was the same for both projects.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @14y+1kf215ayb

It is clear that the ELT is grasping at straws. Retention and Growth are stagnant as our overall service level has fallen to never seen levels of FA disappointment . The promised efficiency of Salesforce and Moneyguide for branches has never arrived.

We are all living the agile worst case with broken systems and products that will never live up to the hype. If this is finding our Rich then count me out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @14t+1kf215ayb

I survived the ER, few still crazy things i’m seeing.

Head of Data - Kevin F. - no real job experience, bringing no culture/leadership. He fired all of the good ones just so that he can keep his own job + everyone is fleeing his organization because of how bad his leadership style is. He is so good at making zero decisions.

Digital Product - bunch of pretend product owners who has no intention in helping business/financial advisors, their product strategy always misses the mark, very little people are using the product capabilities.

Digital Tech - people like Scott F. - racist, s-xist and total HR disaster managed to survive ER, i thought all of my colleagues had hopes. He is one disgusting human being where he drools on young offshore girls.

Operations/Service - Jose A. / ELT all looking for cheapest (does not guarantee quality) resource offshore so that their pockets become fatter.

Clients of EJ - transferring their balance out of EJ. There are so many reasons but main reason is, “why keep money in a place that serves legacy clients?”

I am about to take an offer to leave this place but few observations that worries friends and colleagues who will still be at EJ.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hz+1kf215ayb

I heard Service is getting the ax. Outsourcing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hj+1kf215ayb

@ha This is exactly why I posted this question. This is happening all over the firm and it’s serious. And the leaders don’t know and aren’t digging into it. I still love this firm and I care immensely about our clients. I am a client, as are many family members. I am currently being sc--wed over by our new pharmacy benefits as well and can’t get access to prescriptions for my medically fragile child. I pray that leaders will see this post and respond internally to fix these egregious issues.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hf+1kf215ayb

@b5 what?!?!?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ha+1kf215ayb

I voluntarily left a while back (in no small part due to chronically unaddressed issues with material negative client impact). My understanding is that the work my previous area owned, which was deemed business critical and would cause reportable events if issues were not addressed in a timely manner, has all but been abandoned due to ER. It is surprising to me that there has not been any related regulatory investigation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ed+1kf215ayb

Most senior level GPs have sold their soul for more money. They don’t care as long as they move up and make more money. We have become everybody else.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cv+1kf215ayb

@b6 No, well not to my knowledge. I don't work in this area but close by. I won't say more than that because I really like my job and don't want to lose it. I've thought long and hard about clients not speaking with people in Home Office, and I can't see how this will go over well. Maybe I'll be wrong.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b7+1kf215ayb

@b5 client relations?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b6+1kf215ayb

An area that speaks with clients has plans to outsource its work in T1. Some clients will be discussing their sensitive information with people who don't work in Home Office.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b5+1kf215ayb

Post a reply

: