Thread regarding Comcast layoffs

Another round of layoffs in Q1

There’s been some speculation about another round of layoffs, and unfortunately that speculation is accurate. Another round is coming soon. The core issue is pretty simple: we’re losing customers and we can't increase prices any more. When revenue isn’t growing—or is actually declining—cost cuts become inevitable.

Video has been in long-term decline for a while now. Traditional cable TV isn’t coming back, and 5–10 years from now it’s likely a dead product. The uncomfortable reality is that cable TV is still Comcast’s largest revenue stream. When your biggest source of revenue is in structural decline, the downstream impact is unavoidable.

Broadband is also under pressure. DOCSIS 4.0 isn’t delivering the results that were hoped for, and customers are increasingly choosing fiber instead. DOCSIS 4 can be talked about all day, but the reality is that customers now have real alternatives—and many are choosing fiber because it’s faster and often cheaper, or FWA because it’s easier to buy and use.

Voice (landline) is obviously a dying product, and the organization supporting it is still far larger than the business justifies.

Wireless is selling, but it’s not accomplishing what it was supposed to do—namely, reducing broadband churn. It’s true that customers with wireless have lower churn, but the causality may be backwards. Customers who were unlikely to churn in the first place are the ones signing up for Xfinity Mobile. Customers who have fiber alternatives or who are unhappy with Comcast tend not to add mobile at all.

Both the Division/Regional teams and the Technology & Product organization likely need to be reduced further. The next round of layoffs will probably look similar in size to what we’ve seen over the past couple of quarters, but unless business conditions improve, a much larger restructuring—including the elimination of entire organizations—must come sometime next year.

From my own perspective, having visibility from the Finance side: despite the cuts that have already happened, there are still significant opportunities to reduce costs. We continue to have too many resources allocated to Video, Voice, and even DOCSIS 4.0. If these products are not selling or are in structural decline, it’s hard to justify continued heavy investment. Additionally, we still pay a premium for U.S.-based engineering talent, and it’s not clear why we haven’t shifted more work to CIEC, where costs are less than a quarter of comparable U.S.-based roles.


by
| 5415 views | | 40 replies (last April 20) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kd4a7kc5

40 replies (most recent on top)

@1f2 newsflash : they care about all 3. Comcast has always had an issue with ALL OF THESE.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @h0v+1kd4a7kc5

@9m8 value of dollar in 1985 and after 2024 is so much different. Especially after Covid, inflation literally increased 50%+ on groceries itself.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g74+1kd4a7kc5

@9m8 AI = Another Indian

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a0q+1kd4a7kc5

it is only the s tart. The cost o f inernet is much much too hig h. It was 20 dollars in like 19 85. It is time...time to can can the as ian in di an. They make the cost more than 5 times. It is 5 times! time to deal with the problem

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @9m8+1kd4a7kc5

@2dw
Ah! Yeah. It's just we're putting new cover sheets on all the TPS reports before they go out now. So if you could go ahead and try to remember to do that from now on, that'd be great. All right!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2jd+1kd4a7kc5

@1zp they are not the only group who works 100% remote.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2j9+1kd4a7kc5

@2dw complete fabrication of internal customer service leadership team to save their jobs. According to you, positive customer comments from tNPS surveys, are “many many many…” sounds like an exact quote from their leadership team to HQ, because they don’t know how to quantify exact data. Here’s an irrefutable fact about internal customer service….they are a huge expense/cost center.

You mention outsource CS team are unable “to complete” tasks that internal CS teams can fix. It sounds like a training issue and/or access to the exact same tools as internals.

If HQ is looking for additional cost efficiencies, start with internal customer service first, BEFORE other groups are impacted.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2dy+1kd4a7kc5

@1zp yes, TNPS surveys show better performance onshore. You can also review written customer reviews and see that on many, many, many occasions, offshore service couldn't help but onshore could.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2dw+1kd4a7kc5

@11c do you even know what percentage of the business is broadband/cable? stop giving stock advice immediately.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @27s+1kd4a7kc5

@24k sure you’re from a different company..wink wink. So you’re just here to save internal Comcast customer service from being outsourced because they’re so GREAT. How nice of you. Lol

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @250+1kd4a7kc5

@1pf totally different company, same realm… but nice try. All stands true on the inside.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @24k+1kd4a7kc5

There are no more division teams. What are you talking about - “reduce division teams.” They’ve been decimated

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @23j+1kd4a7kc5

@1yr “US based CS performs significantly better and reduces churn…”. That’s laughable. You mean the millions of lost customers in 2025 alone were part of their lower churn? What report are you reading that from, an internal NPS survey?

All you have to do is go on any social media platform and read all the negative comments about Comcast customer service. These negative comments continue regardless of where it’s answered.

And you don’t cite that internal customer service is a huge operating expense. Why don’t you include their attrition rate, their FML usage alone, outside of absences. They receive commission bonuses for being mediocre. And they are the ONLY group to work 100% remote.

The answer is to improve the app and reduce fail rate, not hire more internal mediocre customer service personnel.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zp+1kd4a7kc5

@1pf the app fails for about 30% of activations. Offshore CS teams fail just as much. US based CS performs significantly better and reduces churn. Offshore teams should only be used for after hours ops.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yr+1kd4a7kc5

obi wan, the force is asking for canceling jobs from as ia. Both sides are into it. The jedi and the sith are in the game with purpose.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1y5+1kd4a7kc5

Why does it seem like 90% of the middle management laid off last month was rehired with different titles? Voluntary Retirement just hit 12/31. Layoffs are usually next if patterns repeat.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qa+1kd4a7kc5

@1nk complete BS! You sound like someone who works in CS trying to save your job. I spoke with an agent who is in Georgia. She knew I was a fellow Comcast employee. She was rude and acted like I bothered her. Customer Service needs to all go away. I use the app as much as possible. So yeah, no one gives a sh!!et if CS is outsourced.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pf+1kd4a7kc5

@1f2 ohhh they do, and MANY are keeping a close eye on this - more than Comcast probably knows. Customer service complaints in the past were also for reaching someone people couldn’t understand, so good luck going back to it. It’s takes twice as long or more. Offshoring will be the downfall of Comcast and other businesses. Not to mention a total security risk for all. But, nothing to see here….

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nk+1kd4a7kc5

@1e4 customers don’t care that jobs are outsourced. They care about 1) low prices, 2) reliability of service.

If Comcast would like to reduce expenses, I’d suggest they look at internal Customer Service and continue to reduce their headcount. With all the customer losses, why aren’t the internal customer service team not affected by reduction in force? They are culprits in Comcast’s horrible reputation. And we’re talking even way before outsourcing happened.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1f2+1kd4a7kc5

Yah, let’s offshore more work…🙄. What a joke. If anything, why not just offer American tech workers less?? None of these overseas workers have yet to prove reliable, (they are rarely around when needed) and let’s just see how many more customers jump ship from this, because they will. Offshoring was one of the biggest complaints from customers Comcast has had in the past (dealing with overseas support) and now they want to expand it in larger capacities?! Shameful. After these current layoffs, people aren’t stupid. They see Comcast being blasted for this all over the internet and so much more. Any company offshoring, including Comcast, should be largely fined or more.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1e4+1kd4a7kc5

I’m a developer in the CONNECT organization working on DOCSIS 4 development. The amount of code and software we’re required to write is staggering—borderline absurd. The additional complexity that Elad and Mody have introduced into the DOCSIS 4 implementation is beyond crazy. What we’ve managed to achieve so far is technically impressive, but the reality is that we could have avoided most of this complexity by implementing a much simpler passive network. This is exactly why fiber wins.

Leadership is misleading upper management by showcasing impressive DOCSIS speeds. Charlie and Dave (now Steve) seem to believe it. But the truth is that Charter’s approach to increasing spectrum is far simpler and achieves comparable results. Meanwhile, both we and Charter are losing badly to fiber. Fiber is fundamentally simpler, cost less, and delivers higher speeds, lower latency, and a more stable network.

If the goal is to extend the life of HFC networks, the right approach is to keep it simple—like Charter does. If the goal is to move into the future, then follow AT&T and others and build fiber. Instead, we’re stuck with an incredibly complex solution that achieves remarkable technical results but is far too complex, far too expensive, and will ultimately fail—after burning through $10–15B in investment.

I wouldn’t be surprised if Elad is forced out in 2026. He’s had roughly five years to launch DOCSIS 4 and “save the company” with the so-called zero-outage network. Honestly, it’s unclear how much real progress has been made.

As for me, I’ll stay as long as I can. It feels like a long downward slope. Maybe I can hang on another three or four years, take a decent severance package, and then retire.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1a9+1kd4a7kc5

When I was laid off from Comcast, I contacted the Comcast XPE department and asked what the cheapest internet only plan was for a former employee. They told me it was $80 before tax. I said no thank you. Quantum One Fiber was offering service for $30 per month. Ain’t no one going to pay a huge premium for outdated technology and poor customer service.

Also their severance policy is only one week for each year of being an employee. So please listen to other people and do the minimum amount of work and don’t be an overachiever.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @18e+1kd4a7kc5

Comcast lost over one million customers in 2025 alone, and that trend is only going to accelerate and get worse.

And when American see their jobs swim offshore... sure, everyone will sign up more services.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @15c+1kd4a7kc5

For real. Holding onto Comcast stock is like holding onto BlockBuster, RadioShack, Sears, AOL, or Kodak stock lol. The signs are there. People are so stupid to buy Comcast stocks

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @11c+1kd4a7kc5

AI is eventually going to replace 99% of jobs, so nearly all jobs will disappear, whether they are in Philly, at the CIEC, or in the Philippines. Comcast lost over one million customers in 2025 alone, and that trend is only going to accelerate and get worse. It feels like a sinking ship. If you are working there, make sure you take advantage of the 6% 401k match, mentally check out, do the minimum required while looking for another job, and use the EdAssist $8K tuition benefit. Cable TV is effectively dead due to on demand streaming. Comcast is charging significantly more for inferior coaxial technology while competitors charge significantly less for fiber, and their wireless service is not even their own, it runs on the Verizon network. It feels like almost every Comcast employee has mentally checked out. Also, When my team or I open a TechSpot ticket, we often do not receive a response for over a week lol. It seems like they laid off a lot of IT employees and the people who remained are clueless. Also, don’t participate in the ESPP plan because the stock is in free fall! If you have any , sell them immediately. It went from $60+ to $29 and in the next year or two, I guarantee it’s going to fall under $5.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @11b+1kd4a7kc5

@OP 'Additionally, we still pay a premium for U.S.-based engineering talent, and it’s not clear why we haven’t shifted more work to CIEC, where costs are less than a quarter of comparable U.S.-based roles." - a bit smug aren't we for a department that will easily be sent offshore and enshittified just like the rest of it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zg+1kd4a7kc5

it does not matter anymore. the customer base is decreasing. As people move away they close the internet. as people die they don't need internet anymore. So this means we won't care what the price is for in dia people. 2 or 1 or 200 to 1. You can just go back to in dia if you can't find a job here. you can leave and nobody will miss you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qy+1kd4a7kc5

"look for a new job"

You do know every company is using the same playbook right?

Everything that can be moved offshore will be moved offshore, or be replaced with H1B in place. Search our many wonderful advisory firms' "Rethinking outsourcing for strategic value and innovation"

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @p2+1kd4a7kc5

@ay look for a new job

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @j9+1kd4a7kc5

@ht numbers are numbers. They can probably get 4 for the price of 1 in India. More perspectives, better data validation. What’s not to love? Offshore everything except techs and sales staff on the ground.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @j8+1kd4a7kc5

I hear we can get comparable finance people in India for 1/4 the price too so don't think that you're safe OP.
Docsis 4.0 is a joke.
Comcast sold its future when it sold off its wireless spectrum in 2011 and took on debt to buy media companies at inflated prices.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ht+1kd4a7kc5

Any attempt to try and save the aging and antiquated coax infrastructure is just putting a bandaid on a geyser. DOCSIS 4.0 is and will always be a joke in comparison to fiber. I’ve been telling upper management for YEARS that we need to focus on fiber deployment if there’s any hope of keeping pace with the competition. There’s literally new fiber companies forming in my area because they know potential customers want fiber, and would do anything in their power to avoid Comcast and their awful customer service.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gj+1kd4a7kc5

@cb oh they certainly will. Between that and AI. There will be no need for them. They just dont know it yet.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d8+1kd4a7kc5

@OP why dont you volunteer to have your job shipped offshore if it's so important to you. I'm sure they would let you put your name to the top of the spreadsheet to be "culled".

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d7+1kd4a7kc5

Quality post. That DOCSIS 4.0 is even an internal conversation vs. the anemic fiber rollout is a joke. Competitors will continue to chip away. If you made it through the latest round of layoffs, congrats, you’ve committed yourself to more anguish in the quarters ahead. What’s that chime? Oh, just another “Business Update” arriving to your inbox.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cx+1kd4a7kc5

The company’s culture is rotten to the core and this post is indicative of that. There is zero emphasis on quality - in customer service, engineering, finance, or anywhere except maybe film on the NBC side. Moving engineering to CIEC will save costs short term but guarantee Comcast’s decline long term.

The company spent the 2000s absolutely gouging and running over its customers. Its current position is completely unsurprising. Everybody hates Comcast.

All of this starts from the top. Until Brian Roberts gives up the reins and the company finds a good CEO that values their employees and customers, it will probably continue to struggle.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cw+1kd4a7kc5

Instead of investing in fiber to the home.
Comcast's Sky (Europe)
Acquisition: Comcast bought Sky for $39 billion in 2018.
Value Write-Downs: Comcast has since written down Sky's value by billions (e.g., $8.6 billion in 2022).
Recent Activity: In late 2025, Sky was in talks to buy the broadcasting arm of UK's ITV for around £1.6 billion ($2.15 billion), showing strategic focus on core markets

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ct+1kd4a7kc5

"Additionally, we still pay a premium for U.S.-based engineering talent, and it’s not clear why we haven’t shifted more work to CIEC, where costs are less than a quarter of comparable U.S.-based roles."

you get what you pay for. I'm sure someone in India could do your finance job poorly as well.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cb+1kd4a7kc5

"Additionally, we still pay a premium for U.S.-based engineering talent, and it’s not clear why we haven’t shifted more work to CIEC, where costs are less than a quarter of comparable U.S.-based roles."

What do I do that my job is shifting offshore?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ay+1kd4a7kc5

When in q1

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ak+1kd4a7kc5

Post a reply

: