Thread regarding Ford layoffs

Just because a company can do something doesn't mean they should.

I understand this is the now 'normal' capitalistic way - cut off the arm to save the patient. This is what Ford is doing and many others but it can be done in a better, more humane way.

I escaped one toxic environment at another company to join Ford. Ford cut me loose last Wed after 2 years. I was told it was a great place to work. I was miserable at my previous job. So I went the agency route and took that leap of faith and joined Ford.

Now, the toxic environment I escaped from lasted 5 years and still continues to this day. Rumors were constantly swirling around of which most had some truth to them. Departments were gutted. Some were completely outsourced. For the latter, those who kept their jobs (for the short term) wound up training their cheaper replacements.

The employees would live in fear during the week waiting for that mysterious e-mail with no sender or agenda telling them to report to a certain room on Thursday or Friday. We quickly learned waht this e-mail meant. This was how the company handled their 'RIFs.' (Reduction in Force was their term for right sizing the company. Ford is using 'Smart Redesign.') This was the kiss of death. The Grim Reaper was there to escort you to the curb after the meeting. If you didn't get that e-mail you were able to relax a bit on Friday. You could enjoy your Saturday. When Sunday came you realized you had to return to that 5th level of hell on Monday to repeat the process. I saw many good workers sacrificed in the name of profits.

People were walking around like zombies. I heard that anti-depressant use rose. People were breaking down in hysterics in their cubes or bathroom. No one smiled anymore. It became the worst job I ever had.

It became the most toxic environment I ever worked. People started hoarding knowledge. People refused to train anyone on their jobs for fear they were training their replacement. People were quietly making others look bad to make themselves look good.

It also started with those with 25+ years of service because they made too much money. Or those 50 years or older. Or those that had to use their medical benefits. (The company was self-insured.) Or those that had a PIP (Personal Improvement Plan). Or a combination of all or some of the above. One person my my team had a trifecta of these. That was my walk-up call. I saw the writing on the wall. Eventually there was a bullet with my name on it. I decided I was going to leave on my terms. I left after 10 years.

They started with a decent compensation package of two weeks pay for every year of service. Then they capped it at 26 weeks. Then they stopped the severance package altogether. Now? All they do is give you a bad eval to get rd of you. Once you receive that there is nothing you can do but get your resume ready and start searching for a new job because you will be kicked to the curb. I have heard of stellar employees receiving above expectations or role model on their evals year after year and then mysteriously receive a needs improvement.

After each RIF, there was a huge all-hands meeting. Leadership would tell us the lay-off's were over, that we would have to focus and do our jobs and that the cuts were done. In another week, or two, or three, more RIFs came with another meeting with the same lies. Ad nauseum. The inside joke became: How do you know leadership is lying to you? Their lips are moving.

When I joined this company we were doing the jobs of 1 1/2 people. (They company had high expectations. We had a mandatory 45 hour work week. 50% of the employees probably worked closer to 60 hours each and every week.) As more and more people got released, that turned to 2 people. Then 3. All for the same compensation. You did it because you needed a job. You put up with it because you needed a job.

Will this happen at Ford? I don't have a crystal ball to say for certain. I will keep in touch with the friends I made their to see if it does.

To end, there is a quote I like by Martin Niemöller that I think applies to situations likes this:

"First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me."

by
| 1321 views | | 2 replies (last May 20, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Z9bSjfS

2 replies (most recent on top)

@wbi That is easier said than done. I have worked for a union in one my jobs while all others have been non-union because I was salary. The union job (hourly) was when I worked for a retailer in Michigan. (I was going to college.) It was as useful as a screen door on a submarine. The managers failed to cross their T's and dot their I's when they termed someone. I had to work with turds that were fired 3 to 4 times and always got their jobs back because of some omission by the manager.

Using Walmart as an example. They claim to be pro-employee but are actually anti-union. They have actual classes at their home office that trains their management employees on how to handle situations when employees try to unionize. They WILL close stores. They have training classes for the store employees about how great their 'open door' policy is if there are employee issues. (Insert eye roll here.)

Do a google on further details but they closed a store in Canada when the meat cutters were to unionize. After that, they got rid of all meat cutters and went to pre-packaged meat. Another example is more recent. WM closed 5 stores in the south because of rumblings of the stores being unionized. The stores were closed for around 6 months under the pretense of plumbing problems. They waited out the employees in hopes they would move on and find jobs elsewhere. The stores were opened after the 6 months (or so).

In order for a company like WM to unionize EVERY employee would have to be on board and do a walk out. Once it hurt profits drastically, then WM would listen.

And typically, management are salaried are are not allowed to unionize.

Don't misinterpret what I said. I am neither pro- or anti- union but I sure as hell despise these right to work laws where they can fire anyone 'just because.'

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tsl+Z9bSjfS

I read this and think, why in the hell don't you people form a union and stage a walkout. My God people, power is in the numbers. They can't fire everyone, but yet everyone comes to work each day like sheep to be slaughtered. One day there will be no place to run, every company will do this. Then and only then, you would hope employees will ban together and do something. Take control and set the example folks!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wbi+Z9bSjfS

Post a reply

: