Hey guys,
For those that were let go and also paid for 60 days under the Warn Act. Do you guys have a copy of both of those letters?
9 replies (most recent on top)
id--t 1: No, you stop it.
id--t 2: No, you stop it.
id--t 1: No, you stop it.
id--t 2: No.
And this is why anonymous blogs are f---ing useless.
2tup - if you don’t have the letter we received, there is no reason to respond. OP asked for the info, not an explanation after making assumptions to the reason for the request.
You should take your own advice if you don’t have the information and let it go.
If individuals want to investigate the Warn Act, how are they hurting you?
Again…the schools were NOT in receivership in July…they were for the lay-off on 1/22 and any forward from there. Receivership means…the Warn Act does not apply. You can’t get blood from a stone…there is no money to be had from DCEH. If the front desk says there is no money for postage…do you think you are getting a severance? Let it go
I get that but OP specifically asked about July layoffs in the title. We received WARN notices for those that were affected in July, so I don’t see how the WARN act doesn’t apply to the question.
Last WARN Act only impacted the schools that closed under DCEH in 2018. This receivership situation is a totally different story.
Receivers offer courts and parties the opportunity to achieve accurate, fair, and efficient outcomes without bogging down in the expense and delay of conventional litigation.
Working with the court, receivers can provide the structure, guidance, and legal remedies that parties cannot marshal on their own. Receivers are the court’s eyes and ears; they can gather missing information and transcend dysfunctional relationships. Receivers can stabilize and manage businesses, gather and secure fugitive property, sell operating entities, liquidate assets, pursue and defend lawsuits (including fraudulent transfers), and create a claims-resolution process. In short, receivership offers an expedient exit ramp on the long road of litigation.
Why is it wrong for this person to ask for our letters? Did I miss a post or topic because this specifically asked for the letter sent specifically to those that qualified.
If I can find mine, I’ll post the wording, OP.
And. Again, for the tenth time, receivers are not technically employers under federal court precedent. So, they do not have to adhere to WARN.
Hey less than average intelligence person that keeps posting this. There is no severance. Everything is in receivership. Even if you found something that said you should get severance there is no money.
Use this energy to go find a job. You’re wasting it with this garbage.