Thread regarding Sears layoffs

Sears Creditors Oppose Sale to Edward Lampert Accusing Him of Fraudulent Conveyances

https://www.wsj.com/articles/sears-creditors-oppose-sale-to-edward-lampert-11547767983

Retailers’ creditors seek to sue ‘savior’ and his hedge fund ESL, accusing them of causing Sears’s destruction

By Soma Biswas

Jan. 17, 2019 6:33 p.m. ET

Sears Holdings Corp.’s creditors are balking at the retailer’s proposed sale to Edward Lampert, its former chief executive and would-be rescuer, accusing the hedge-fund manager of stripping Sears of its best assets before dumping the chain into bankruptcy and reacquiring it on the cheap.

In a filing Thursday in federal bankruptcy court in White Plains, N.Y., lawyers for the committee representing Sears’s unsecured creditors asked Judge Robert Drain for permission to sue Mr. Lampert, his hedge fund ESL Investments and its president, Kunal S. Kamlani for the “excruciating, slow-motion destruction” of the 126-year-old retailer.

“Over the course of Lampert’s and ESL’s reign, Sears closed over 3,500 stores, cut approximately 250,000 jobs and lost untold billions in value,” lawyers for the committee wrote in the filing, which also accuses Mr. Lampert and ESL of running Sears like a “private portfolio company that existed solely to provide the greatest returns on their investment” at the expense of the brand, its employees and creditors.

Mr. Lampert and the hedge fund “have painted themselves as saviors” attempting to keep some 400 Sears stores open, the creditors’ lawyers said, arguing instead that the retailer can’t survive as a going concern.

ESL is Sears’s largest creditor and its most significant source of financing in recent years, a spokesman for the hedge fund said, adding that ESL’s actions “have always been taken in good faith, on fair terms” and been reviewed by its board along with independent directors and advisers. The firm promised to contest claims against its transactions with Sears, the spokesman added.

A Sears spokesman declined to comment.

Mr. Lampert succeeded in keeping control of Sears on Wednesday after the retailer’s board accepted his $5.3 billion bid over a rival offer from liquidators.

Mr. Lampert bought Kmart out of bankruptcy and combined it with Sears in 2005. As mall-based retailers stumbled over the past decade, the cash-strapped Sears sold many assets, including Lands’ End in 2014. The following year, it sold hundreds of properties to a new, publicly traded real-estate investment trust, Seritage Growth Properties , for $2.7 billion. Mr. Lampert is chairman of Seritage and owns a major stake in the company.

Sears’s creditors say the Lands Ends’ and Seritage transactions, designed to move the struggling company’s valuable assets out of creditors’ reach, were engineered to benefit Mr. Lampert at their expense. Their filing Thursday challenges those deals, and a series of financing transactions between Sears and ESL, as fraudulent transfers that left the retailer insolvent.

The committee—which includes landlords Simon Property Group and Brixmor Property Group as well as bondholders and the U.S. government’s pension insurer—also took aim at the $1.3 billion “credit bid” portion of Mr. Lampert’s offer, designed to forgive ESL’s loans to Sears.

So-called fraudulent conveyance lawsuits, such as the one Sears’s creditors said they will bring, don’t typically involve intentional fraud. Instead, they are premised on the idea that an insolvent company paid out money but didn’t receive value in return, so the cash should be returned to creditors. Companies that end up in bankruptcy after leveraged buyouts, like Sears and media giant Tribune Co. , or after being spun off, like chemical company Tronox Inc., often prompt such lawsuits from creditors. In 2014, Anadarko Petroleum Corp. agreed to pay more than $5 billion to creditors of Tronox stemming from the chemical maker’s improper spinoff.

Lawyers for Sears’s creditors’ committee said it would file its proposed suit under seal—to comply with a prior court order and because it relies on confidential information—but said it believes the suit should be “litigated in open court,” according to court papers.

A hearing on the sale is set for Feb. 1 in White Plains.

by
| 1226 views | | 6 replies (last January 18, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+XbjaETJ

6 replies (most recent on top)

The bankruptcy, the extension, the negotiations were all a watershed. We all have to be resigned to the fact that Eddie won round 1 and round 2 will be 'Liquidation Eddies Way' which he will win too. As the saying goes 'Money talks' and it sweet talked all the way.

Its upto the current employees to continue working with Sears or look out for another job. Speculation or cribbing won't help. Agony Aunt may help.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xch+XbjaETJ

I think the Judge is going to ignore this, with the reason being that the issue was never raised by creditors until more than three years had passed for the most recent (Seritage) deal, despite the creditors knowing that there were major problems with Sears. The LE deal was concluded five years ago. Again, the criminal statute of limitations is three years, and the limit for actions by the US Trustee is two. NYS has a six year look-back period, but the issue is going to if Sears received fair value for the properties. 2.7 billion and below market rents for a given period (minimum of 6 moths IIRC) are going to make a fairly convincing argument that fair value was in fact received. If it is determined that fair value was received, there are a number of other factors that should be considered, such as liquidity if the deal hadn’t gone through, but the Judge may also simply decide that since fair value was received that’s the end of it.

I can also find no reference to a fraudulent conveyance case where a party named Chesapeake paid out 5 billion to settle claims.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nxx+XbjaETJ

Nothing will come of this.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @prc+XbjaETJ

The Creditor's case is simple. Eddie transferred property from Sears to Seritage, improperly moving those secured assets out of the reach of creditors. How do they know they were improperly valued?

Seritage's asset value went up by a $400M immediately, and Sears' fell by a billion immediately. Yeah, it's out of federal statute of limitations. So what. It's still in New York statute. They don't give a hoot if shareholders were properly compensated. They're not shareholders, they're creditors, and they weren't compensated a single penny. There's precedent for fraudulent conveyance too. Look what happened with Chesapeake. That lawsuit ended up with Chesapeake paying a cool $5B. Eddie thinks he's going to make them going away with his paltry $35M offer? He's got another think coming. They're coming for the whole $3B, and the $6B in shareholder buybacks, and every last penny ESL is worth.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mwt+XbjaETJ

State matters get removed to bankruptcy court all the time. Bankruptcy judges have wiiiiide latitude there. Pretty obvious when you think about it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @esg+XbjaETJ

I’m unclear if fraudulent conveyance is actually a privately actionable federal tort in and of itself. Criminally, the statute of limitations expired in June or July of 2018, so the SEC can’t do anything. NYS apparently has a longer look back period, but this action is in federal court. That article also makes a hash of what fraudulet conveyance. Sears paid out no cash to Seritage, rather Seritage paid Sears cash for the properties. I will believe this lawsuit is for real once it is actually filed and substantiated, rather than The ongoing speculation and threats to file that have been continually emanating both in BK court docs and in the media.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wjt+XbjaETJ

Post a reply

: