Thread regarding Qualcomm Inc. layoffs

The Apple dispute- Why is there no middle ground?

I understand the need to settle this in court, but looking at the media statements that the leadership of the two companies are giving in the media, Apple and Qualcomm look to me like an old couple that love each other, but are constantly fighting. We are talking, we are not talking, we are close to a settlement, we never spoke….. The fact is that Apple was a good customer for years, also the fact is that Apple was pretty satisfied with Q’s products, they just don’t want to pay as much for them. Also, they are taking a big risk with Intel, given that everybody relevant knows they have inferior products at the moment. Couldn't have the company officials just sat down and work it out at everybody's benefit. This way they are just stirring up a hornet’s nest, with no predictable outcome, not to mention the media circus.

by
| 2021 views | | 14 replies (last January 17, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+X2P0ajW

14 replies (most recent on top)

some official numbers here:

http://kitnadetihai.in/layoff/Qualcomm

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8kid+X2P0ajW

Mav hates Qualcomm. I've worked both sides of the fence and basically all our customers hate us.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6kif+X2P0ajW

aberle is the reason not molly

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3yvi+X2P0ajW

@jW-2fqp -yes a Cialis moment in the making! Where the new couple hug and kiss in the courtroom and Judge Koh dismisses the case just as the funding runs out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2rba+X2P0ajW

I agree with OP

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ryn+X2P0ajW

OP has a point, with SM's boyishly metro good looks and financial witticisms, how can Tim possibly resist in the long run? Sometimes, we just have to know when it's right to take one for the team...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2fqp+X2P0ajW

Apple won't pay 100B, 10B max

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2hbf+X2P0ajW

SM, that's why. How can Apple not stand up to such a poor businessman. You do realize Tim Cook runs Apple, and the Boston Group puppets SM. It's true, SM hired another company to do his job. WTF but it's true

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cjj+X2P0ajW

because Q is a dysfunctional mess clinging to life by their increasingly irrelevant patent portfolio

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pil+X2P0ajW

Why any apple just buy qcomm ? Its just 100B and settle it for good..

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vjw+X2P0ajW

Apple wants to use the government it bought to kill qualcomm. Qualcomm does not want to die. What's the middle ground here? Coma?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cdk+X2P0ajW

Have you worked with them before or you just "think" they were good customers?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rev+X2P0ajW

Total misinformation ... Maverick was never a good customer. Good customers don't steal software and give it to a competitor.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oex+X2P0ajW

The argument is about Royalty rates. Apple wants it substantially lower from what I read.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xyw+X2P0ajW

Post a reply

: