Thread regarding IBM layoffs

IBM sued by 57 year old for Age Discrimination

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6562823/Former-IBM-employee-57-accuses-company-firing-age-discrimination.html

A former IBM employee is suing the IT company, alleging she was fired because of age discrimination.

Terry Keebaugh, 57, was fired from her role as sales director in September 2016 as part of 'restructuring', one month shy of receiving $573,000 in commissions for deals that would close at year-end.

According to a complaint filed with the United States District Court Southern District of New York on December 21, she received just $20,000 and was replaced by a younger employee who generated less revenue.

'IBM's age discrimination is longstanding and pervasive,' the complaint states.

'Since 2012, IBM has implemented age-based reorganizations twice a year, sending loyal IBMers over age 50 to the chopping block while sparing younger employees.'

Keebaugh, from Alpharetta, Georgia, began working at IBM (International Business Machines) in 1984 just months after graduating from Georgetown University and Catholic University, according to the complaint.

For the first 10 years of her tenure, she was employed in the Maryland and Washington DC offices.

She worked her way up from marketing representative to her final title of Travel and Transportation Client Director.

The complaint states that Keebaugh taught herself and mastered 'the skills necessary to successfully service the accounts IBM assigned her'.

Among her clients were AT&T, BellSouth, Cingular, MCI, Travelport and Verizon.

According to the complaint, there were no signs that Keebaugh was performing poorly or worse than her younger colleagues.

Allegedly, during her final year-end performance review in 2015, she received a PBC 1, which is the highest rating possible within IBM.

She was even assigned to work on IBM's Millennial Task Force initiative to hire younger workers in fall 2015.

'The aim of this initiative is to, over a period of approximately four years, transform IBM's workforce to be at least 75% millennials, i.e., employees in their 20s and 30s,' the complaint writes.

'Naturally, as part of this initiative, IBM has and will continue to fire droves of older workers who exceed IBM's discriminatory age limit.'

A ProPublica investigation found that between 2013 and 2018, IBM fired 20,000 US employees above age 40.

That amounted to 60 percent of its total job cuts in the US over that period.

Keebaugh said she noticed that IBM was firing its older workers before they could train the younger employees in the tech company's mainframes.

She suggested that the older employees put their best practices into a database so that the new employees could easily be trained.

This led to a 'cognitive solution' patent application and an achievement award from IBM on August 30, 2016, for her application.

The very next day, on September 1, 2016, her boss sent her a letter stating she was being fired as part of a 'Skills Transformation Plan' and that her last day would be November 30.

In a call with her boss, Keebaugh says she was told that she had been rated 'lowest of the low' compared to other employees in an assessment of skills.

However, the complaint states that in 2015 she had doubled revenues for one client and that she had contracts in December 2016 that were expected to close worth a combined $100 million.

Keebaugh claims she was replaced by a new, younger employee who was not able to produce as much revenue.

Luckily, just a month after her last day, she was offered a job as Business Development Executive at Tata Consultancy Services.

Her lawsuit claims IBM is guilty of age discrimination under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act, of age discrimination under state law and of wage reduction under labor law.

IBM did not immediately respond to DailyMail.com's request for comment.

by
| 2021 views | | 10 replies (last January 9, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+WZyoOt7

10 replies (most recent on top)

@1fpv...

That's a big excuse. She was pulling fat checks and was in an executive position. She didn't just do what she was told, she even devised a patented solution to make the process of replacing older workers efficient.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3zqd+WZyoOt7

Kind of like when IBM moved jobs off shore and made the American's train the replacement. She helped write the manual on the skills transfer. Would be great if she has some good documentation on IBM's goal of having 75% millennials, could be the smoking gun.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ehw+WZyoOt7

Well she had to do her job or they'll fire her. Damnwd if you do and damned if you don't.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fpv+WZyoOt7

She was happily part of the team that replaces old employees with millennials. But now she got to eat her own pill and she is unhappy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vxa+WZyoOt7

my thoughts exactly - why did she wait? maybe they had to prep a rock solid case? who knows...

i hope she wins, but why did she wait 2 years to file the suit?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1not+WZyoOt7

Since Ginny is over 40 and has been floundering for years she must be let go and be replaced by a millennial as no one can tell the performance difference.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kkw+WZyoOt7

She will get something undisclosed, and good for her.

What a scumbag move to dump her before paying out a commission.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hai+WZyoOt7

Obviously this genius never watched the Honeymooner's episode where Ralph recommends to Mgmt that bus traffic routes be cut on Madison Avenue to ease congestion and he was the first to be resource actioned! LOL.

What did she expect? Hey let's remix the age of the workforce to millenials and by the way I'm 57 but ain't no way they touch me! Simply Brilliant.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xzh+WZyoOt7

Lawsuits are expensive and exhausting she had to find a lawyer who would take her case and take part of the settlement.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fts+WZyoOt7

i hope she wins, but why did she wait 2 years to file the suit?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fea+WZyoOt7

Post a reply

: