Thread regarding CVS layoffs

CVS owns Aetna- that cannot be reversed

You need to understand the deal is closed, CVS does own Aetna. This cannot change as they own the company now. The issue is that the judge may block the integration of the 2 companies which means CVS Health would be forced to run the companies as separate entities and not mix the two together which is the intention of Larry. It would perhaps mean that those who are Aetna insured could not be forced to use CVS if at all. Regardless the company is owned by CVS.

Even though I found this post on another thread where it was posted by @WDmoQeQ-1uic , I see a lot of people don’t get the consequences of a potential blockage of the Aetna merger, so I thought it was worth reposting.

by
| 1203 views | | 2 replies (last December 17, 2018) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+WF3bi3i

2 replies (most recent on top)

There was a judge in Texas who even invalidated an entire chain of sales going back 150 years, reverting ownership back to the State of Texas because proper procedure wasn't followed. You don't mess with procedure.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hwk+WF3bi3i

Judges can reverse sales transactions, even those that have been finalized, sold, and taxes by the IRS itself. I've seen it happen.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vtv+WF3bi3i

Post a reply

: