Very quickly. I would think their operating costs would be available somewhere. But, even assuming a scanty 100 full-time faculty with very low salaries ($50K/year) that's $5M right there. Then there are the extant on-site campuses, IT staff, and other support staff. So, I reckon, with absolutely the tightest ship possible, no more than 1 year of the status quo, unless more money to operate has been promised. If not, within months, a serious restructure will occur with on-site locations obliterated, and remaining students forced online--staffed primarily by adjuncts.
Cogswell has purchased a turnkey online infrastructure. Whatever middle managers remain, their DNA is only accustomed to executing zer orders from above--who will tell them what to do, and what will they tell them? End-course evaluations (ECE/MCE) became a threat and a justification for stalling careers or ending them. Shove 40 students into a class and expect that the course had better please them. Yes, PLEASE them. Make material "more achievable," when it's already been denuded of any intellectual or transcendent value--we're not here to ennoble anyone. "Work" with students ill-prepared to hand in any assignments, no matter how basic. Accept late work. Too many Fs--that's a problem. Too many students dropping--that's a problem. Do not expect or grade on a qualitative basis--you don't have time for that anyway. Plagiarism? It's an "educable moment" (after moment, after moment).
Middle managers complicit with top-level administration--the latter interested only in bottom-lines, the former only in saving their own asses--played favorites, manipulated IPPs, invented narratives of how 30-year teaching veterans could "improve," accentuated any student complaints, regardless of fairness, and minimized any accomplishments.
Faculty were beat up for any and all problems associated with the admission of an (un)remediable population of working adults with families, desperate to improve their circumstances, but lacking time, commitment to actual improvement, and basic skills necessary (reading comprehension, vocabulary) to achieve a college-level intellectual outcome or who were outright predators, riding the financial aid train until the rails end.
The evaluations of an online professor with 40 students in a "killer" course (which students hated, were not good at, and were among the most difficult in the curriculum) were compared with those of an on-site professor with fewer than 10 students in courses that students liked and were part of their majors. Ridiculous. What could be expected but that standards dropped, grades were inflated, and learning fell off the table?
And the few very good, very hard-working students who aspired to more than mere regurgitation of information, who had competencies and abilities to innovate meanings--these got swallowed in the Faustian nightmare.