Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Difference between Diane Bryant and Murthy

If the board were to select one of these two to head the company, the key difference between the two is: while Murthy will make the company to meet ground zero at the speed of light, Diane would do it at the speed of sound.

Diane is nothing but a cheerleader and that is what she did in quarterly updates when company server program was not doing well, there simply was no problem every thing in her eyes was just peachy, refused to admit reality.

Murthy struggled to clean up the roadmap and has achieved nothing over years other than internal factions and bickering.

Hope the board has more sense than choosing one of these two

by
| 3573 views | | 5 replies (last July 5, 2018) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+TZTlwUG

5 replies (most recent on top)

Thanks, mkx, and that decision would show an extremely weak board Wich is more interested in politics than growing and strengthening the company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jnb+TZTlwUG

Intel continue to run scared, fearing discrimination lawsuits by so-called "tech females' who see Intel as a soft target for litigation. BK deserved to be canned for so many other legitimate failures to move the company forward, but the Board used the weak fraternization excuse to make him a fashionable #MeToo sacrifice and so attract more unqualified progressive women candidates. So, I think DB gets the nod here for CEO to continue the theme even if it weakens the company and prevents competitive innovation that Intel so desperately needs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mkx+TZTlwUG

If you're so bright then the board not even arsing itself to put Murthy in the interim CEO position should've already told you something.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cug+TZTlwUG

Both very bad choices. Stay away!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ael+TZTlwUG

Murty has been focussing on the top job and not the job he was hired for. After some initial bluster about Execution focus and practically messing up every prodzct execution, he has stopped talking about it. Wgat ge has done is to vring in droves of QC pals at grades & levels far higher than the capabilities of these 'pals'... M has proved to be poor hire.. inept at best, greedy & a blatant liar and manipulator at rhe worst..Ms role needs to be downsized so he can show he can deliver b4 talking abt the next level

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mxu+TZTlwUG

Post a reply

: