Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Google Cloud COO departs, fueling speculation that she's in the running for CEO job at Intel

https://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/news/2018/07/03/diane-bryant-google-cloud-intel-goog-intc.html

by
| 2021 views | | 14 replies (last July 6, 2018) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+TZ2Fr0p

14 replies (most recent on top)

@2rcg - Yeah, like a bad version of Charlie's Angels.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ggf+TZ2Fr0p

But Intel will be super diverse all the way down.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2rcg+TZ2Fr0p

What has DB actually done at Intel? She gets zero credit for DCG - it was all KS who developed the long-term XEON strategy when AMD was kicking Intel's a$$ in servers. DB just rode it for several years and developed NOTHING new (SKL-EP? Really??). She will add nothing other than empowering women, which doesn't help 10nm or develop ANY new architectural advances. Intel is cooked.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2peq+TZ2Fr0p

Just give DB 2-3 years as Intel CEO, and she will be competing against Meg and Marissa for the worst female CEO of a tech company in history.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dby+TZ2Fr0p

I nominate Marissa Mayer, former Yahoo CEO, since she did so well rescuing that company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1peo+TZ2Fr0p

Look to the top and the BoD if you have any questions about how a company who’s competitive and strategic future is in technology as to why it lost its way the last decade.

Pick the wrong CEO or not challenge his strategy and execution is how you got to the intel of today, past the tipping point

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cvy+TZ2Fr0p

Meg Whitman

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fmm+TZ2Fr0p

I don't really care other than someone who can keep the stock price rising. But with a recent history of "personal issues" and LOA, then 7 months at Google, I wonder if she cares enough to fight the board and give Intel a long term strategy. TMG has to go, or at least design with TSMC tools/process for a future major product line to give TMG some competition. They act like they have a captive customer, which of course they do.

The new CEO needs to look at Brian's exec level hires and clean house - Staples, Starbucks, Bain consultants ... really just people with no clue about the technology sectors. Then kill all the stupid BK initiatives that havent already self distructed - drones, faux fireworks, self driving cars and planes, smart sunglasses, ...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @som+TZ2Fr0p

Of course the BoD will select an Intel relic. All 300 VP's will be safe along with upper management and it will be business as usual on the titanic instead of selecting an outsider to clean house with a different perspective.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jtm+TZ2Fr0p

At least she seems to be a nicer person when speaking compared to some others

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ynh+TZ2Fr0p

Absurd, ridiculous selectio, if true. Intel needs a fresh set of eyes, not one of the cronies from inside.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @geo+TZ2Fr0p

@TZ2Fr0p-jeu: if she were the one, would some executives leave already?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ryu+TZ2Fr0p

Word here internally is that DB has been selected as new CEO, should be anounced next week at the latest.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jeu+TZ2Fr0p

She has long been floated as a top candidate to fill the CEO post at Santa Clara-based Intel, including when the job became available in 2013. Instead, another longtime Intel leader, Brian Krzanich, was named CEO, and led the company for five years, until his abrupt departure last month following a board investigation into a "past consensual relationship" with another Intel employee that violated a non-fraternization policy.

Bryant was "the strongest candidate for a job before (Krzanich) and was far more successful than him and very well-regarded inside the company,” longtime Intel analyst Rob Enderle told the Business Journal last month, after Krzanich's resignation. “Second, she’s a woman, which I think Intel could use right about now.”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lqb+TZ2Fr0p

Post a reply

: