The new VP that started earlier this year is on the board of a company called HITRUST and they have some partnership with Trendmicro. A lot of people in IT Security have either been fired or quit already. They are hiring a new director next week who will be responsible for outsourcing the rest of the team to HITRUST/Trendmicro. This has to be a conflict of interest to outsource to a company where the VP is on the board. He has to be getting some kind of kickback. I wonder if the eteam really knows what is going on.
22 replies (most recent on top)
Miami !
training Headquarters of trend micro! .....oh wait they are located 10 miles from Sabre.
I guess it’s just a way to reward people for firing employees. Congrats security leadership all new low hit!
Good news the bosses are getting training in Miami however we are on a cost cutting measure.
“This is so worth the cost of firing people” risk and security losers scoff!
In Sabre security world , showing progress by putting cyber ark on laptops is like patching the Hoover dam with gum.
Anyone having any CyberArk problems yet?
Companies whose strategy and operations is based on "managing to trends" are followers and will never innovate, this includes outsourcing to trends - whatever that means. Sabre is so slow on just about every front that by the time the leaders think they are on trend, the trend is over.
Who manages outsourcing to trends versing need?
It’s coming. CyberArk has already been installed on all laptops for that reason.
How long before our office PCs are so locked down that we cannot run anything on them other than MS Office?
After all the development is outsourced why would we need to run anything else anyway?
Transparency!
It is confirmed! In our team meeting this morning RM basically said we are outsourcing to Trend. I thought he was supposed to present his ‘security strategy’? What a joke! His only strategy is whatever the Trend sales guy is selling.
I don’t think RM works from home. When he is not in the office at Sabre, he is working as a salesman for Trendmicro and HITRUST.
I think R did not like the fact people were calling him out for wfh all the time and even then, he's unavailable. Seriously, this guy does nothing.
If there were a thumbs up
This is my favorite
5) criminalization of fraudulent handling of documents, interference with investigations, and violation of disclosure rules, and 6) requiring chief executives to certify financial results personally and to sign federal income tax documents. The provisions of SOX have significantly changed SEC disclosure requirements.
Not sure why my comments were omitted,
My lord you are sacred and evrything to me despite the devil who precedes in other prodcut areas.
And leaderships,
Dear lord forvgive them for not accepting me in Christ they have been overcome with demons and their judgement wans. Lord I forgive them. They know what they do but don’t care.
Seriously they would lie .. I guess it’s an option but not belivqbke
It seems even with no names that Sabre has brought otherwise peaceful shareholders to protest or protest too much, out damn spot out . I hate that sb is involved
This is my favorite
5) criminalization of fraudulent handling of documents, interference with investigations, and violation of disclosure rules, and 6) requiring chief executives to certify financial results personally and to sign federal income tax documents. The provisions of SOX have significantly changed SEC disclosure requirements.
The whole thing smells
SOX thus deals with 1) reform of auditing and accounting procedures, including internal controls, 2) the oversight responsibilities of corporate directors and officers and regulation of conflicts of interest, insider dealings, and the disclosure of special compensation and bonuses, 3) conflicts of interest by stock analysts, 4) earlier and more complete disclosure of information on anything that directly and indirectly influences or might influence financial results, 5) criminalization of fraudulent handling of documents, interference with investigations, and violation of disclosure rules, and 6) requiring chief executives to certify financial results personally and to sign federal income tax documents. The provisions of SOX have significantly changed SEC disclosure requirements.
eliminate the practice of "selective disclosure," in which business leaders provided earnings estimates and other vital information to analysts and large institutional shareholders before informing smaller investors and the rest of the general public. The regulation forces companies to make market-sensitive information available to all parties at the same time. Dramatic and sweeping amendments were made to the SEC's disclosure rules in the summer of 2002 with the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, often referred to simply as Sarbanes-Oxley, Sarbanes, or SOX.
WTH ! It’s not like the weren’t true...
More like site admins’ doing, names and peronal insults are not allowed here.
Wow!!! All of the replies have been deleted. I guess Roy didn’t want people knowing the truth about him.