From the article: "The layoffs contribute to a total general and administrative and interest savings of $175 million annually, but Hager said the decision was about more than cost.
"It was about increasing the focus of the company," he said. "It will reduce the cost, but we would have done this regardless of the price environment.""
All I can say is if you divide $175 MM by 300 employees, you get a value of over $583K per employee. Those are some expensive employees that were layed off. Maybe they are counting the value after reinvesting the savings of the 300 employees salaries and expenses back into field projects using some kind of rate or return, but I don't know. It sounds fishy to me..