Seems to be an effect of many, not all, VPs, who lack any integrity?
It's not the CEO or CFO.
5 replies (most recent on top)
Come on, it's been already corrupted long ago; doesn't matter Indian or whatever
This happened when a large # of Indians became managers.
OP, I understand what ticks you and you are not the only one, but we won't go anywhere by mislabeling.
About the VPs, they are of the lowest quality in the industry and are set to fail. Across the Intel, negative selection keeps safe and promotes politician power point talker types while it pushes out or fires shakers and doers. When Andy Grove was there my impression is that at that time it was the opposite.
Question when, it is surely more than a decade ago. Best indicator is Intel values that went from vanishing through manipulation paths around it until today to outright breaking or doing the opposite.
Question about the corruption, it is unfounded claim as there is very little proof and it would very hard to prove it (investigate director and above for any kickbacks from the competition, partners or contractors like Vipro or Tata). Widespread and sometimes gross mismanagement (incompetence and nepotism) is the more precise term.
@bdi - Hah! I remember the days when AMD came out with faster 386 CPUs. That precipitated the internal Intel fake news era. AMD faced reality and always did it better until the whole licensing scenario fell into a legal black hole. Jerry Sanders always said that competition was good - for everybody. Intel never believed that, and ultimately, it will sink them.
The day that Andy Grove signed the papers to take the x86 sole source, he signed Intel's death warrant. AMD has the rights to the x86 architecture because Intel cross-licensed it. Once Andy decided that he wanted to be a billionaire, Intel was on the decline... or was it when Andy decided to fire Federico Faggin, the actual inventor of the 4004?