Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Small sites that survived ACT... Safe now?

If a small site such as Raleigh survived ACT simply because it contains a recent Intel acquisition, how long will that reprieve last? Will the "small sites are bad" rule apply to those sites eventually?

Murthy was the brain child of closing small sites. Hard to believe that he will just leave the sites alone long term.

by
| 1341 views | | 4 replies (last September 5, 2017) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+P6FuPlC

4 replies (most recent on top)

You'll never be completely safe at BK's Intel. Period.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kpn+P6FuPlC

Depends on politics. Do you have a grade 12 sitting there that wants to stay? If so he may have power of creating longer a life for the site but in the end the odds are not in your favor IMO.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hvf+P6FuPlC

Like ACT it will be justified with BS about velocity of decision making and other BS. When you're acquired by Intel, you just become a number.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wag+P6FuPlC

Not long at all, separate lease for facilities and other things add up. Classical consolidation and then great ACTs as soon as lockdown expires

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cfo+P6FuPlC

Post a reply

: