Thread regarding Boeing Co. layoffs

Boeing avoiding WARN in St. Louis with lots of medium to small layoffs?

Any word if Boeing St. Louis BDS, SSG, and IT / Engineering are still doing or going to start doing many small to medium layoffs so the don't have to report a WARN to Missouri like they have done the past few years?

There is a federal law requiring advanced notification for mass layoffs, the WARN Act (Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification) . With regard to the WARN Act, the law does not require advanced notice when only a handful of employees are being let go and when the layoffs are spaced out, such as ongoing layoffs, which we have all seen happening. Also, recall when the layoff numbers were large at the HO, such as in October, 2015 when 450 were let go, Walmart avoided advanced notification because the number laid off fell just under the 500 person threshold that would have required WARN notice be given.

The following is an excerpt on how WARN works. Covered employers may need to give WARN notices (to employees, their unions where applicable, and certain government officials) in the following circumstances:

“Plant Closing”: where an employment site (or one or more facilities or operating units within an employment site) will be shut down, and the shutdown will result in an “employment loss” for 50 or more employees during any 30-day period.

“Mass Layoff”: where there is to be a mass layoff which does not result from a plant closing or employment site, but which will result in an employment loss at the employment site during any 30-day period for: (a) 500 or more employees, or (b) for 50-499 employees if they make up at least 33% of the employer’s active workforce.

Despite the reference to a 30-day period in the definitions of plant closing and mass layoff above, there are additional provisions that allow for the aggregating of employment losses for up to a 90-day period in some cases in determining whether WARN notices must be provided.

by
| 2281 views | | 1 reply (October 25, 2017) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+OjUTkeH

1 reply

Lockheed, Boeing, Northrop and perhaps the other big aero-defense companies have been playing this game for a long time where the ongoing layoffs are continuous throughout the year but the numbers laid off at any given time is always kept below the threshold where the Warn Act applies. Through an ongoing stream of smaller layoffs these companies have laid off thousands or actually tens of thousands of workers without ever showing up in the news or having to report to the government. Since it is a common knowledge that this type of layoff has been happening for a long time, I wonder if the wording on the Warn Act was written purposefully to allow companies to bypass the government reporting or continue to cheat the system.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1Ctob+OjUTkeH

Post a reply

: