Thread regarding EMC Corp. layoffs

I would be surprised if much has changed because if it did, most of the managers would be gone

Previous experience with layoff at EMC: just about all of the people laid off who were not able to find another position or offered another position were 45+... oddly enough, young white males and some females magically got promoted and/or better jobs... o

Oh, and was told by a divisional director they used a stacked ranking to determine who would get the jobs offered which is just a sorry excuse to give whomever they want jobs even though they are not the most competent and productive employees.

When you are laid off, you get some skewed layoff notice with the ages of employees laid off and those who were not and it a giant piece of BS and totally irrelevant -- it encompasses every group they can think of to skew/offset the ratios and just another dirty, sleazy layoff tactic they use to get rid of older employees.

It's all really criminal but they get away with it; during the time I was laid off they had 100+ in-house attorneys, the majority who did nothing but collude with HR and managers to cover up all of the illegal/questionable/discriminatory behavior that was rampant in the company and no doubt still is, it was the culture and went all the way to the very top.

I would be surprised if much has changed because if it did, most of the managers would be gone and clearly, the employees who actually work are the ones still getting the axe, management seems to always take care of each other and why that good ole boys club has been in existence since the DG days and looks like membership to the club is at an all time high these days.

by
| 4811 views | | 6 replies (last February 13, 2018) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+NmGqnfq

6 replies (most recent on top)

"That's why Unions aren't a bad thing. Surplus and/or layoffs are spelled out in the contracts. Seniority, passing as many written tests as possible to better the odds abd no discipline issues is how new positions are determined. Not nepotism or favoritism."

I witnessed some of the complaints written on this thread. Nepotism, favoritism, etc. didn't matter much, just delayed the inevitable. It was like rearranging the chairs on the Titanic. Many are going into the water, and the very same ones that pulled the favoritism stuff got laid off themselves. I actually saw it, and it was very sad.

Unions / seniority / tenure: this is not perfect either. There are dedicated, hard working union members for sure, but there is also dead weight milking the system. Oh, the stories I hear 1st hand from family and friends in unions. Nuff said.

There isn't a magic pill for this problem.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4mnsn+NmGqnfq

Legal dept hit hard as well.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @22pae+NmGqnfq

They won't need managers when storage is dead in a few years - who will get the last laugh then

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @Lyfn+NmGqnfq

That's why Unions aren't a bad thing. Surplus and/or layoffs are spelled out in the contracts. Seniority, passing as many written tests as possible to better the odds abd no discipline issues is how new positions are determined. Not nepotism or favoritism.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bepg+NmGqnfq

this is true. I am from Legacy Dell. The managers who do this will not leave easy. This is their turf, their rules.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4okn+NmGqnfq

I have seen first hand in legacy Dell storage, managers give promotions to their favorites, pay hikes to some but not for everyone, silver, gold and MVP awards to their inside engineers, top dollar bonuses to under skilled as they kiss a--, manipulation in reviews and layoff those who work hard and try to make products good. Just height of power and discrimination and power show off by managers.

Mr. Dell might not take any action and he might have 1000's of attorneys.

Every problem has a solution, let's fix this code.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rka+NmGqnfq

Post a reply

: