Thread regarding Altice USA (Cablevision) layoffs

But unionized Brooklyn techs Didn't Receive The Same Benefits As non-unionized Techs. OH, REALLY???

That's what you're told by management. I should know. I was in those meetings. It's basically a movie script. Everyone is instructed as to what to say and do. And the goal was to create a feeling of inequality. To cause you to think that you're treated better than those who were in the union. Well.... SURPRISE... SURPRISE..... SURPRISE !!!!

The Brooklyn union and Cablevision agreed to add a provision or clause into their contract concerning benefits. This clause is known as the "Me Too Clause". Here's the definition:

Most Favored Nation Clause (aka “Me Too Clause”):

a Clause in a collective bargaining agreement whereby the union agrees that if it signs a contract with another employer containing more favorable terms such terms will automatically apply to the present contract.

What it means is that "whatever you're getting... I get it, too." Hence the term "Me Too".

I'll bet you never knew this, huh?

Here's the exact wording in Brooklyn's contract....

"ME TOO CLAUSE" excerpt from Brooklyn CBA

ARTICLE XIX: EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

Subject to the Company's rules of eligibility and applicable law, each bargaining unit employee shall be covered by the following Company benefits on the same terms and conditions as they are made available to non-bargaining unit employees employed by the Company in the state of New York. The Company's discretion and judgment as to the interpretation of, eligibility for, and practice under the respective benefits shall prevail. The Company may provide any such policies, programs, or plans itself or through a third-party vendor or by changing a third-party vendor.

  • Employee Assistance Program

  • Employee Product Program

  • Employee Services Program

  • Commuter Program Policy

  • NY State 529 College Savings Program

  • Savings Bond Program

  • Bethpage Federal Credit Union & TD Bank Policy

  • Flexible Spending Account Policy

  • Wellness Program

  • Group Legal Plan

  • Employment Verification

  • Operational Recovery Program

  • Inclement Weather Policy

  • Dress and Uniform Guidlines

  • Travel and Entertainment Reimbursement Policy

  • FreshStart

  • Vacation Policy

  • Personal Time Policy

  • Holidays Policy

  • Sick Leave Policy

  • Workers' Compensation

  • Income Protection (Short-Term and Long-Term Disability) Plan

  • CHOICEPlus Medical Plan, Cablevision Dental Plan, and Cablevision Vision Plan

And yes, if a non-union Cablevision tech was told that a certain benefit will no longer exist, the unionized tech suffers the same fate. If the rest of the Cablevision footprint found out that Brooklyn was receiving the same benefits like themselves, ALL HELL WOULD'VE BROKEN LOOSE.

I hope this gives you an idea of the B.S. I had to endure during my time with CVC. The difference with me was that I never told my guys this B.S.

And that's because you never know what comes to term between the union and the employer. And since that is the case, how in the hell can management know IN ADVANCE what or what NOT you are going to receive?

Simply because it wasn't fact. I am not a Clinton.

by
| 681 views | | 5 replies (last March 19, 2017) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+MlXp6Z9

5 replies (most recent on top)

Yes, it did. The "Me Too" is more or less a "shortcut". Instead of dealing separately with the company concerning the 401K, Wellness, Group Legal Plan. etc., unions tend to bundle them up in one shot. Almost like a package deal, whereby either you buy separate automobile components, or just go out and buy a car already made. It's the "what's good for the goose is good for the gander" deal.

Mind you, changes in company policy can never be halted by workers who are union or non-union. If a company is "hurting" as far as business is concerned, it will cut down on certain items in order to survive. Union contracts are meant to protect members from "revenge acts" by the company. To provide fairness across the board.

Hope that answer suffices.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2kap+MlXp6Z9

Yes, it did. The "Me Too" is more or less a "shortcut". Instead of dealing separately with the company concerning the 401K, Wellness, Group Legal Plan. etc., unions tend to bundle them up in one shot. Almost like a package deal, whereby either you buy separate automobile components, or just go out and buy a car already made. It's the "what's good for the goose is good for the gander" deal.

Hope that answer suffices.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2kie+MlXp6Z9

So does that mean that cause we lost 3 sick days and a holiday Brooklyn did too?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1knr+MlXp6Z9

The real thugs are corporate and management. Constantly threatening us about the union, saying we are going to loose our benefits. Your going to have to pay union dues. So what? What do you care, it's not your money. If the union is so bad why you fighting us tooth and nail. We don't need your input.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ytc+MlXp6Z9

this is funny. get over it

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hrr+MlXp6Z9

Post a reply

: