So they outsource to third party companies working from NY, NC, CA or India---but then decide to build "collaboration" by forcing employees in the USA to all report to a hub where most teams are not located---nothing illegal in that but just a horrible plan and not engaged with current technology
7 replies (most recent on top)
@MCNNLKr-1jii--finally someone with a clue---next step after requiring workers to "report" to a hub is firing for failing to do it - if you want to admire and follow companies like HP, etc., thinking they are idea centers like Google, as a manager you need to follow your archaic ideas and buy a clue- it's Col Mustard in the library with a candlestick
This information has nothing to do with Paragon. There are other systems and technologies in McKesson besides EHR's. You don't believe it. Suit yourself.
@MCNNLKr-gas: Put down the bong. You have no idea what you're talking about.
True for IT/Shared Services.
5 location hubs have been defined and all employees within driving distance of hubs are being asked to come into the office. Second wave is to be determined, and it's not clear if this means relocations or if exceptions will be granted. Oddly enough, other BUs are being asked to achieve more mobility, which includes remote workers and less in office expectations.
Poster is right about not being modern with current technology. What about expectations from the workforce, especially those right out of college?
Not True. Poster does not have a clue about Paragon. Must work for Cerner or Epic.
Such a mess
You first have to realize that Paragon was built without healthcare in mind nor current technology. Paragon sort of started from scratch but on a very ill-designed, non-healthcare related foundation. Just like anything built on a poor foundation like a house or obamacare, it will surely collapse. As well as just becoming a money pit with little to no quality or value. And if the emphasis is on cheap, you'll get what you deserve---cheap.