Kaby Lake runs hotter and consumes more power, too -
Tom's Hardware's testing revealed that the Core i7-7700K is only 3.6% faster than the Core i7-6700K across the benchmarks they performed.
Hey Intel, you might want to start calling all of the people you just gave ISP.
Very sad -
http://www.techspot.com/news/67224-early-core-i7-7700k-benchmarks-suggest-minor-speed.html
@KDZrJNZ-yod Well intel is totally getting double phucked than!
ARMy with far superior low power moving to 10nm and 7nm shortly will soon wipe intel products on aging 14nm with no 10nm anytime soon. Very competitive and soon superior ARM coming with crazy price and scale advantages.
Than you got a little x86 undercut priced from old nemesis and this time with superior process kick to BKs nuts.
Maybe BK will find some new fad to take focus away from how the core of Intel is failing!
No direct x86 competition?
AMD is taping out x86 designs on 7nm using TSMC. you might want to evaluate that statement.
No process scale so no cdyn scaling, as frequency goes up power goes up, simple physics. All you get is a little more frequency for same standby with 14+, benchmarks seem about right.
Intel is so phucked without 10nm . Lucky in x86 land no direct competition, but ARM is coming on 10nm this year and 7nm next so server will see some pressure and Intel is finished as ARM will conquer all!
the only reason I need a faster chip is so Microsoft can steal my personal info faster.
Most sites are questioning those, something is up with the power numbers. Time will tell
Crap performance. What a waste of time.
Cool story bro