Thread regarding Western Digital Corp. layoffs

Can recruiters at HR speak up on hiring malpractices in tech companies?

Most jobs are "generic descriptions" advertized solely to justify that no local candidates were found. The jobs on most large company websites - the companies do not plan to hire anyone at all. The supply of engineers in the market has long surpassed demand. Just take the example of the jobs posted on Oracle's website. Many have the same "format".

Can employees begin to complain to EEOC against the age discrimination in hiring?

Can Recruiters step forward to share the insider scoop on how companies hire employees?

The Labor Department says "Millions of jobs in tech exists". Truth is the advertisements are fake - fake in that the company has already hired a fresh college grad (International student on an F1 visa) and is making the legal and necessary responsibility to justify the hiring.

by
| 2171 views | | 6 replies (last October 22, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+JVa1fWU

6 replies (most recent on top)

The older people at WD are the knowledge core for disk storage. Eliminating them first is just the most cost effective measure before total capitulation that HDD storage has had its day. Really the issue is you have a dying company (with the exception of SSD) and sales are s---y because pc's have had their day and now are to gamers and special interests folk. WD could target various storage niches but it looks like that won't happen and will be left to smaller perhaps startup companies.

I'm a laid off older guy. I think the reason companies might pick younger engineers is for pay reasons not for skill (or age) reasons. So us older people will likely have to choke up and take much less pay to survive the years until retirement. If this was a growing economy we could transition to an alternate without a meaningful pay hit. Check out Applied Medical and how they are occupying a multitude of buildings in Santa Margarita and Irvine and supposedly paying poorly. Lean and mean.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4kdb+JVa1fWU

Workers at HP are suing for age discrimination. They got the CEO saying sge want to have lots of young workers and only a few older workers. If anyone has evidence of WD management saying that, post it here. We need to share evidence of age discrimination at WD. We all know it's happening. WD's just trying to hide it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4qws+JVa1fWU

Hiring right now seems purposed to fill an immediate need rather than build a team. Experience is valued and some employers know that can come with age. You are a fire fighter rather than a fire builder.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3dur+JVa1fWU

Many of the job descriptions require skills that an experienced engineer already has. At hand is the issue of companies wanting to hire only under-30 younger workers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ryb+JVa1fWU

It is also incumbent upon us, the older workers, to keep abreast of the developing technologies and the latest technological / engineering processes. We cannot depend on our current employers to invest in our re-training: We must re-train ourselves. Keep your knowledge base up to date.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xfk+JVa1fWU

One way to have legal age discrimination is to require work processes, software, etc. in new job offerings that we never were introduced to. We thought we were doing a good job but new companies were introducing new ways of doing things. Recruiters don't even understand different forms of engineering and matching up resumes correctly. Its a mess. Keep good contact with fellow employees as they are your best bet to find something new.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yhc+JVa1fWU

Post a reply

: