Thread regarding Staples Inc. layoffs

When did mediocrity become success?

As I reflect on a working career spanning nearly 40 years that has included jobs ranging in scope from building retaining walls, to co-owning a painting company, to delivering newspapers, to middle management, to coding, to designing web sites, to even a stint working the night stocking shift at Office Max (remember them?) during my tenure in Graduate School, never in all that time have I worked for an organization that has embraced sub-standard performance from its leadership as much as Staples.

From the CEO on down there exists a barren landscape void of imagination, vision, integrity, passion, and the ability to inspire not only internally but externally. Nevertheless, it is ripe with dated management philosophies requisite from the passé teachings of the MBA programs from which Staples draws its senior and junior level managers. Top down oppressive fist banging oligarchs of failure primed for a world of weeks, months, and years trying to compete in an era of milliseconds, seconds, minutes, and hours while espousing a cut throat culture of blame and self advancement.

Staples continues to blindly follow a belief system predicated on the notion that there is and was an “Office Supply Industry” rather than acknowledging the concept of the stationary store was simply “supersized” and re-titled. It took this belief to the “nth” degree when it attempted to execute a previously failed 18 year old strategy in purchasing Office Depot at a cost of $250 million in fees and probably the same again in internal buried “costs of doing business” associated to the planned acquisition. And yet, the Board rewards the architect of this disaster and the 10 year decline of the company with a dignified exit replete with a retirement package. Not a sound message to society.

Thus the Sargent was removed from the battlefield and instead of giving us the General we so desperately need, the Board gives a Private Second Class at best. “20/20”? You know what’s 20/20: Hindsight. Our forward looking strategy is to look backward. When a person essentially begs people to follow them as our current CEO did in the closing of the most recent state of the company address it doesn’t take an advanced degree to know that this is not the person to lead Staples into the future.

So is it all doom and gloom? Pull yourselves off the ledge and back into the safety of the building fellow Staplers. There is one glimmer of hope on the horizon and it rests with the Lead Director and Head of the CEO Search Committee. This President and CEO of CRBE knows how to lead, knows what a good management structure looks like, knows what success is, and most importantly understands the power of technology, the need to leverage it, and that a modern tech stack is crucial to moving forward. Odds are he’s looking for someone with the same qualities, who’s hungry and unproven but feels they have something to prove, who can communicate a vision, who sees the world in 10 year blocks but who can break it down into smaller actionable segments, and who knows how to build a culture and run a team.

Let us encourage our Board to do the job that they are elected to do and take a modern turn towards supporting a 21st Century workplace by hiring a leader who believes in a flat management structure, a meritocracy, true teamwork, a Championship Culture, and who isn’t afraid to remove those who do not support the standards we set ourselves not those set for us.

Should they not, then we just leave the current rudderless barge that is Staples to drift on the sea of the economy until it runs aground on the shoals of bankruptcy and slowly decays into the dust of memory that is the mindless banter of Fitzgeraldian Wall Street c---tail parties.

by
| 1311 views | | 4 replies (last August 31, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+J8lylh6

4 replies (most recent on top)

Watching from Afar makes a fabulous case in the context of Staples remaining in its current state.; and that is the problem with Staples.

Organizationally they are so myopically focused on Business Supplies that they fail to see the possibilities of simply adopting another definition of the word "Staples" as opposed to the standard, "a short piece of wire bent so as to bind together papers" and all other products that go with paper; including hinging a majority of the revenue generation on Back to School.

Change the definition, change the vision, change the branding, change the perception:

adj

  1. of prime importance; principal: staple foods.

  2. (Economics) (of a commodity) forming a predominant element in the product, consumption, or trade of a nation, region, etc

n

  1. (Economics) a staple commodity

  2. a main constituent; integral part

  3. (Economics) chiefly US and Canadian a principal raw material produced or grown in a region

  4. (Textiles) the fibre of wool, cotton, etc, graded as to length and fineness

  5. (Historical Terms) (in medieval Europe) a town appointed to be the exclusive market for one or more major exports of the land

Staples talks of all the products in their "marketplace" but does nothing to change the public perception away from business only. "Make More Happen"...what the heck is that? Who identifies with that as source consumer goods beyond the entrenched branding?

BOSS..Beyond Office Supply Sales? The strategy to get people focused away from Office Supplies has the phrase office supplies in it. The sad part about that is somebody actually got paid a boat load of money for coming up with it.

Classic BTS example: What follows quickly behind the start of school and is the second leading spending holiday in the US? Halloween. All that precious foot traffic in the stores and all those kids and not one Halloween costume. Even more egregious: Katy Perry as spokesperson who notoriously dresses up in a different costume for almost every song in her live shows. The marketing is built right in and....nothing but more of the same.

No one is asking for the most brilliant CEO. Brilliant CEOs fail.

What Staples needs is a visionary leader. A person who can enact radical change, attract talent, empower individuals, change the culture, and sell the employees, the public, and Wall Street on the vision; and have the courage and conviction to do what is right by all the employees not just the upper echelon.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rxc+J8lylh6

All very interesting. I have only one point. The tide is against Staples. Brick and Mortar are history and what is really key is that .com is an incredibly far distant 2nd and fading fast. The change cycle moves faster than at any time in history and Staples has not a clue about where to start. The most brilliant CEO on the planet would provide, at best, false hope.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ehz+J8lylh6

Sargent should be immediately cut off from the board and receive no further compensation.. He destroyed this company, and Shira is just carrying that destruction further. It's all just a cash grab now..

Here is an interesting question though. What happens to money earmarked for 401 k matching contributions if a large amount of employees don't make it to the annual vesting date?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zgn+J8lylh6

Beautifully written!

I urge you to share this on other sites as well. My assumption is that you no longer work with the company but watch from afar as so many do, perplexed and thinking, "how did they screw this up so bad?"

This company is filthy in it's retainment. They refuse to part with the dirt. This company is so rotten at its core that it will be very difficult for even the most talented to make SPLS an appealing buy. The genius that is needed for this endeavor should simply make their mark somewhere else. The one who decides to take this challenge on is no genius at all.

It's time to crumple it up, like a sheet of cheap 20lb Staples paper, throw it away, and start from scratch if there is any value to this idea. Stop wasting money on this old structure and stop treating your workforce as garbage. YOU WERE THE ONES WHO MESSED UP!

I know it's hard to close it up when you can still fill your pockets. Shame!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nqd+J8lylh6

Post a reply

: