Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Medical leave and SSL4

Would a medical leave in 2015 imply a SSL4 and ISP in 2016? Has anyone been able to appeal And overturn ISP given due to medical leave?

by
| 1621 views | | 16 replies (last May 19, 2016) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+HtEQy8G

16 replies (most recent on top)

"I did take bonding leave and full vacation in2015. I got EE & SL2"

You must have a decent manager. Some of us aren't so lucky...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kmh+HtEQy8G

There is no legal loop hole.

We are not immune to ISP or vsp.

But we are protected from discrimination

And we pay into the insurance and that's what it is for. If you can't go back. To work due to a medical problem

Don't assume we are milking the system. But we are entitled to protection from discrimination.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jbi+HtEQy8G

I did take bonding leave and full vacation in2015. I got EE & SL2

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ktd+HtEQy8G

Shame on the people using the medical leave loophole. Just leave the company as quickly as possible and be done with them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uef+HtEQy8G

And then you can dispute it?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pis+HtEQy8G

Even if you didn't write your self eval, you will still get focal. The results will be available when you are back at work.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cpg+HtEQy8G

What if you didn't write your focal, nor have signed anything, while on focal. Can you disputed that?

And how can you if you aren't at work to meet with manager and HR.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ygw+HtEQy8G

If ISP and medical leave got you ssl4/5 should appeal as they may not have prorated which means discrimination against a disability.

But on the other hand since we know ssl4/5 is ISP in the future it should be disputed as soon as you are aware of it and back to work.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nkf+HtEQy8G

Yes. I got ssl4 for being on leave in 2015.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @avn+HtEQy8G

Are you a white male? Then definitely a leave is an easy excuse to ISP you. How dare you take time away from glorious leader.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rxn+HtEQy8G

Last year 100% of the ISP folks I talked to had one of the following (1) sabbatical (2) maternity (3) other MLOA or FMLA (4) new manager (5) new group (6) long time in grade. To claim MLOA (as one of the above factors) is not considered is stupid. If the new manager has seen you for 2 months and the other direct reports for 12 months who do you think is getting the SSL4 - the new person or a known quantity? Even if they say there is no bias it doesn't take a genius to figure out the bias is real. FYI if you have 5 of the 6 above it's 100% guaranteed you'll get ISP, it happened to me.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pja+HtEQy8G

1kz

Yup, your best appeal is to challenge whether the focal prorated your performance for work you've.

Sometimes foals ignore that.

I would think HR would want to correct that. Legal hit water

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ovv+HtEQy8G

Intel's and the state's policy clearly prohibits considering leaves in focals. Even if you worked two months in a year, your performance should be measured based on the two-months work you did.

You should question your manager why SSL4.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dsq+HtEQy8G

@xfs: what was the impact of the low stock level? I have heard people have appealed ISP immediately after the MLOA and won. I don't someone first hand hence trying to confirm

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lkz+HtEQy8G

I would like to know how you are so confident in making the statement that no 'ISP' is given due to medical leave. The only time I have ever received a low stock level is after a return from an MLOA.

Has anyone else received a low stock level after returning from a MLOA?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xfs+HtEQy8G

No and No ISP is given due to medical leave.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mfc+HtEQy8G

Post a reply

: