Thread regarding Qualcomm Inc. layoffs

Forget the Phony Accelerated Reviews

  1. Just make managers responsible for ensuring that their groups are putting in the hours they are charging. No more WFH, being paid for working out in the Gym, being paid for "Feel Good" events etc. since hours and resources now need to be well managed. This should apply equally to all employees no matter how high in the company they are. Everyone should be following the same rules. If the manager doesn't comply, he should be going on the layoff list with the slackers. If someone is truly putting in 60 hours a week, he should be paid for the time rather than have slackers riding on his coattails and getting team credit for his work.

  2. Give everyone the same benefits both vacation and medical no matter what their position. No more "special" benefits for management. This would likely be a cost saver and save some jobs.

  3. If entire departments are cut, the best performers should be allowed to IOS to another department if there is a fit.

The collective savings would likely go a long way toward meeting the 15% cost savings. But realistically, this will never happen because this would hit too close to home for the decision makers.

by
| 381 views | | 5 replies (last July 25, 2015) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+CEFiYng

5 replies (most recent on top)

Look up the documentary "Let's Make Money" about the effects of globalization.

Then check out Europe, 6 weeks of vacation, 35h work week, one year ma/paternity leave, affordable health care and college tuition, etc., etc. etc. for everybody!

Not many Ferrari's on the roads, though :-( Where do you keep yours?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @deS+CEFiYng

Sell off all the SD real estate and make everyone either work from home or from a lab.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @OEJ+CEFiYng

When I'm WFH, I'm in the most productive mode.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uDI+CEFiYng

Sadly, you are probably right. But if the manager's reports could be ranked by their previous productiveness pattern as well as productiveness going forward, the performance spike would likely show up. I am saying no accelerated reviews but monitor productiveness. The problem of course would be that there is in most cases no quantitative history for previous productiveness or lack of productiveness, which points out that the entire review system is flawed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qlJ+CEFiYng

If there is an option for best performers to IOS, then you will see a lot best performers. If the best performers are ranked by the reviews, then you will end up with the same group that managed to play the system. No matter what you do, you will still end up with a corrupted system because you have the same decision makers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @IMr+CEFiYng

Post a reply

: