Thread regarding Qualcomm Inc. layoffs

We know how to do that...

SM kept referencing that Q knew how to do stuff, but what Q knows how to do is divest.

It's gotten rid of numerous divisions and products, often just prior to a market surge, while it backed expensive failures like Globalstar.

What does Q do when it gets into trouble? Divest. They have no history of any other action.

by
| 481 views | | 5 replies (last July 24, 2015) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+CDmGEDh

5 replies (most recent on top)

Both phones and infrastructure global sales boomed after the sale of the divisions, but Q couldn't capitalize on them, they lacked the practical ability, which is a shame because those were good markets for a while and Q is trying to get back into phones and small cells, but that will probably due now. Regardless, Q doesn't fix floundering divisions, it divests them, I think that is the point that applies.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lhA+CDmGEDh

Please name me one division or business they got rid of right before market surge. Globalstar? No! Omni? No! Infra? No! Handsets? no!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @KP4+CDmGEDh

Globalstar was a failure, regardless, but Qualcomm eventually took a write off on it around 2001 when it folded that was significant. Q creative accounting aside, describing Globalstar as anything but a failure is incorrect.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @IZI+CDmGEDh

Globalstar was a huge money maker for Qualcomm, even though they swindled the poor customers. Globalstar was a Cost+ contract, which means the company was guaranteed to make money no matter what, and they certainly never lost a penny doing the Globalstar project.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @biA+CDmGEDh

It's all ball bearings nowadays. And bit error rates. Everything is a digital communications problem if you stare at it long enough

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @Fsg+CDmGEDh

Post a reply

: