Thread regarding Qualcomm Inc. layoffs

Layoffs July 2015

Definitely not unprecedented. But, at least in my recollection, definitely not as farcical in the past. Maybe I was younger and more naive. Maybe without social media in all its various forms, the rumor mill wasn't as efficient. I watched the layoffs in 1999 happen seemingly out of the blue (http://www.apnewsarchive.com/1999/Qualcomm-To-Lay-Off-Nearly-700/id-2d7a016956e70e8a02ddce6e940d153d) Not really a layoff, but the Ericsson sale was what triggered the options lawsuit (http://articles.latimes.com/1999/may/03/business/fi-33522); the sale of the phone unit to Kyocera was a separate transaction (http://www.cnet.com/news/qualcomm-narrows-focus-sells-handset-business/). There seemed to be a few smaller layoffs in the 2000's - probably under the WARN threshold. However, since the mid 2000's until recently, the layoffs I was aware of all involved non-engineering folks (business development, product management, technical writers, IT, etc.) Engineers tended to get shuffled around different projects unless they were egregiously incompetent. I'd say things turned a corner with the 600 layoff announcement last year. Engineers (even the good ones) aren't safe anymore. In some cases the babies are getting thrown out with the bathwater. I hear a lot of "it's not the same company as it was 5/10/15 years ago". Kinda sad, really.

Anonymous119575

by
| 311 views | | 2 replies (last July 21, 2015) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+CAUnhNe

2 replies (most recent on top)

Lots of unscrupulous hiring with no one from HR paying any attention or has the balls to stop it. It mostly happened on PJ's watch. Root cause of all problems need to be fixed, not just the problem itself. Now we have a CEO that has never been a CEO before handling one of the largest companies in the world with issues that would be tough for a seasoned CEO to solve. If I were to hire someone for CEO, I would pick someone with a track record doing that job. So you have the past leader creating a mess and promoting himself to chairman with a big raise, who put in place a CEO-in-training engineer to run a company that was sinking (despite what Murphy says), who gave him a huge raise, with communications to employees coming from either this site or the news rather than within.

There are lots of low level issues that people bring up here but the buck stops with our highest leaders, who allowed all these issues to manifest and fester.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @u2V+CAUnhNe

Thanks for nice posting (first one i read in this bulletin)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @J3T+CAUnhNe

Post a reply

: