Thread regarding ECMC layoffs

Another mass layoff in the very near future now in the works!

Word is out, during the next week zero coming up ( that is the time when one term ends and the nest term begins a week later), the remaining full time online Everest faculty will be laid off. They are actively bring back adjuncts now so this online division is all adjunct based. That saves millions in health insurance costs. The scuttle butt news is they will say this is aligning to other college across the nation who have already moved to online adjuncts for their online courses. Sorry to see those full timers who feel they are safe now since they were not laid off in the last riff now get the axe.

by
| 861 views | | 15 replies (last May 12, 2015) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+BrpbtL8

15 replies (most recent on top)

Ah....the DOE gradual wind-down plan is moving along very nicely.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1YB9+BrpbtL8

Another mass layoff at the ground schools the end of June. Enrollment numbers are not coming up so more realignment is coming and possibly more campuses going to teach outs. It looks very bad for the WyoTechs, could be closing or consolidating.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @19ja+BrpbtL8

833 doing away with distinction between online and on ground? I thought each campus or region is independent and has to run like its own entity acreditation and all. They are now going to create one giant pool!?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1SFd+BrpbtL8

892: The OP said "during the next week zero" not "next week is zero week".

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1C3o+BrpbtL8

Zero week? Didn't the spring term start in April and the next term begins in July. How is next week zero week?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xwh+BrpbtL8

Do not know if there is any truth to this -- or if it is just a rumor. However, CCi went to a FT online model with the hope that there would be a higher level of commitment and the result would be less attrition. I do not believe it is a standard that needs to be met -- sorry. Look at traditional colleges -- they are doing similar.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @Y4s+BrpbtL8

OP: This would not surprise me but how do you know this?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mY7+BrpbtL8

Accreditation does not require a percentage be FTF. EUO is accredited by ACICS, and the report used by their auditors, which is derived from the ACICS Criteria (the "bible" of ACICS accreditation), states in Section 9.29 (for associates, bachelors and masters degree programs) that it is a requirement the program have "an adequate core of full- AND PART-TIME faculty employed to ensure sound direction and continuity of development for the program." It does not break it down into specific percentages, but only requires "adequate" core of full- and part-time faculty.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2Bj+BrpbtL8

They are doing away with the distinction between online and on ground. They have enough on ground full time faculty to cover the requirement. This is how most schools with online programs operate. They use adjuncts to teach online courses and a combination of full time faculty and adjuncts to teach on ground.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @V9a+BrpbtL8

Unless the whole thing is shutting down, this is NOT possible for accreditation requirements. You think CCi hired FTFs of their own accord!?

http://www.aft.org/position/academic-staffing/accreditation-standards-academic-staffing

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @Zd2+BrpbtL8

@819 that's what I thought too. Going to zero FTF would prove those that claimed the whole thing is being shut down correct

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jA4+BrpbtL8

Doesn'rt accreditation require a certain percentage of FT instructors?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pEn+BrpbtL8

They don't offer the FT faculty the option to step into adjunct positions. They just bring adjuncts that they didn't have room for before (and some that were not given classed for doing poorly on evals). It's a flawed system.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dR0+BrpbtL8

Will any of the full timers be offered adjunct jobs?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @p6J+BrpbtL8

Where or how did you hear this?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fDB+BrpbtL8

Post a reply

: